It is indeed quite possible that your case disability are determined by something, which has a doctor that you've never met the, to say. IMEs in general do not meet or investigate the people who are asked to judge. Instead, check it the files that you have sent to the insurance company and, that once in a blue moon, consult your treating physicians. It is no wonder why they do it. It is difficult, doctors and patients get together over long distances, it reduces the possibility to interfere with an applicant unduly or to try to embellish the results (what they can say), and it depersonalizes is the process so that they feel bad over deny benefits for people who like them and feel sorry for not.

But in this case, they go about it. You, not even doctors, contact those who have the medical knowledge and know the facts of the case the best. Of course they want benefits to refuse, if all they do is reading a piece of paper. You can use hundreds of excuses, written words to discredit, because words can still argue like an other doctor can not arise. Doctors from contacting, or to try to contact, if they know that she not available (i.e. at noon), simply makes the IME job easier, and it's no shock that it is incredibly common in this industry from the treacherous.

In Schully v. Continental Casualty Company, this was exactly the case. Click on the link to read a news blurb, followed by a press release and the entire opinion on the case with IMEs and their Diagnostics by the proxy.

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]

View the original article here