Cosmetic surgery malpractice confirmed case

13:31 Publicado por Mario Galarza


Posted on Jun 11, 2006

The Supreme Court of Virginia ruled that medical experts must reviews "in a reasonable degree of medical probability", but that a lawyer means mistake to make a timely objection to a misspelled question, that on this objection is omitted. District Court for medical malpractice in surgery was sued in Fairfax, Virginia "Tummy tuck" cosmetic plastic surgeon George Bitar, MD. The jury found in appeal in favour of the patient and Dr. Bitar the judgment. The doctor was a complaint, that the patient experts witnesses, his mind with the "magic phrase" couch in the outline details of the misconduct could not "in a reasonable degree of medical probability." Dr. Bitar waited for lawyers, but only after the expert had left the courtroom to the objection. The Supreme Court held that the objection had to be made while the expert witness, not later. The Court upheld the misconduct against Dr. Bitar. Here, the complete medical malpractice opinion is the Supreme Court of Virginia.

back to top


View the original article here

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Propeller
  • Slashdot
  • Netvibes

0 comentarios:

Publicar un comentario