It is actually quite possible, that your case disability are determined by something, which has a doctor that you've never met the, to say. IMEs in general do not meet or investigate the people who will be asked to assess. Instead, check the files that you have to the insurance company sent and, once in a blue moon, check that with your treating physicians. It is no wonder why they do it. It is difficult, doctors and patients together over long distances, it reduces the possibility of wrongly interfere with an applicant or to try to embellish results (what they can say), and it depersonalizes is the process so that they feel bad over deny benefits for people who like them and feel sorry for not.

But in this case, they go in. You contact not even doctors, those, that medical knowledge and know, the facts of the case the best. Of course, they want to deny benefits if all they do is that read a piece of paper. You can use hundreds of excuses, written words to discredit, because words can still argue like an other doctor can not arise. Doctors not contact, or to try, to contact if they know that she not available (i.e. at noon), facilitates the IME job easy and it's no shock that it is incredibly common in this industry from the underhanded.

In Schully v. Continental Casualty Company, this was exactly the case. Click on the link to a news blurb followed by a press release and the entire opinion on the case with IMEs and read their diagnoses of the proxy.

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]

View the original article here