Another good piece of news for all the disability benefits. In the recent case Toth v. INA judge granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment based on the fact that CIGNA's medical team, consisting of DRS. Dan Gerstenblitt and Paul Seiferth, evidence to secure their opinions not disability as point out, that the plaintiff did not offer doctors treating lenses notes. Maybe the CIGNA should doctors who always the lawyers left.

In many cases, one of the major problems is that many debilitating diseases and syndromes beyond current means testing. The insurance of docs, such as such as CIGNA, use this fact to claim that it no evidence of obstruction, when in fact the evidence that they want is unattainable with current medical technology.

In this case, the judge ruled that this was not good enough for CIGNA denied benefits and that the overwhelming record of doctors despite more than enough advantages, that much of it was justified based on "self-reports" from the plaintiff. This a great judgment, that it will reach the impossibility in fact a certain proof that insurance claim recognizes as necessary for the provision of benefits.
Read more, including the entire opinion on Toth v. INA, such as treatment of doctors opinions more weight than insurance doctors can hold.

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]

View the original article here