A Montana jury a baseball bat manufacturer liable in the very sad and unfortunate death of a pitcher. The jury was not that the bat was broken, the manufacturer failed to "warn" the danger.

Unfortunately, this is one of the dumbest decisions I've ever seen.

Read the article, which I've linked with. Apparently, the ball flew the witness the bat faster, less than a millisecond, then it would have flown off bat from a wood. Who should have warned the manufacturers?

The batter? The jug?

Me I question what uses kind of bat of the pitcher when he batted?

If the developer did a warning what had spent with the League, ban the bats to?

See, this is a very very sad death, but I see no way that the baseball bat manufacturer for this young man's death can be held responsible. For me, this is exactly the kind of action and judgment, the fire of tort reform fuels and makes it more difficult for others who is injured.

One comment to "ridiculous judgment, loses aluminum baseball bat manufacturers big time"

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]

View the original article here