"We health care can reduce costs, if we could only affect our liability if we kill people,", they argue.

The next time you hear an argument about the Government arbitrarily establishing a "cap" on medical malpractice damages, close the eyes and the thing of over 15-year-old Michael Blankenship and he left the family.

Blankenship was a fighter. His entire life he fought his autism. He was a winner.

He was a winner until it killed its health care providers with an overdose of narcotic drugs. You killed him (now in their own words) our processes at several points has failed.

Yes, mistakes happen, and that was a terrible mistake multiple health care providers.

The real question is: should the Government decide arbitrarily that young Michael life XX dollars was brave even one fact about he and his family before you know or one fact about the comedy of errors, caused his death?

The answer is votes against-this is a question for juries to decide.

You can read a news report about the tragic death of Michael Blankenship and display the actual lawsuit here.

One comment to "If arbitrary national tort reform this family" tough luck "tell"

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]

View the original article here