In this case we claimed that the defendant of not more traffic came and decided, not more traffic on the right side pass. Problem was, stopped traffic was stopped because a Bicyclist in a bike crossed crossing way with signs that said "If bike in motion, you need to stop."

Defendant missed the signs!

We argued that the defendants guilt pleads to go by before the Court.

USAA voted with to be?

Hell no. The defense is something never true.

Here is our advocate.

Here's their response:

 

Pure doubletalk. We claimed he pleaded guilty and the defendant says "I have not enough information to answer the claim."

If not it, then who?

Who is driving the cost of insurance? Who is honest is?

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]

View the original article here