Man Involved in Deadly Crash While Talking on Cell Could Face Homicide Charges

Man Involved in Deadly Crash While Talking on Cell Could Face Homicide Charges

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

October 26, 2011 - You know, I see police on their cell phone all the time and frankly, this is absurd. Since when did the servants become our masters? So, it is with baited breath that I bring this discussion. According to reports a driver involved in a deadly crash, while talking on a cell phone could be facing homicide charges.

Now, here the facts are that the cell phone prompted the cop to make a stop. According to Concord Police 25 year old Mauro Gutierrez was seen by a Concord police officer talking on a cell phone without a hands free device on Hillsdale Drive, in the vicinity of Overhill Road at approximately 5:45 on Tuesday.

So, the selective enforcement of this law, led to a death. The officer attempted to stop Guiterrez, which turned into a chase southbound on Grant Street until the Highway 242 off ramp. This is where Guiterrez struck another vehicle resulting in the death of the driver of that vehicle.

Gutierrez then attempted to run and was caught approximately a block away from the crash. The 25 year old was arrested and allegedly was in possession of an illegal handgun. According to Concord Police, Gutierrez could be charged with second degree murder and will most likely face other charges for driving recklessly, fleeing from a police officer and violating the cell phone hands free law. The identity of the driver that was killed in the collision has not been released pending notification of their family. What do you think? Do you see my point about how the government needs to know the law and keep it well?

Anyways, I have been discussing these types of cases as a speaker for the personal injury attorneys at Ehline Law Firm PC at 633 West Fifth Street, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071. 213.596.9642. Whether a motorcycle accident, or wrongful death, negligence it was propels your injury claims.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


View the original article here

Could Your Car’s Computer Be Targeted By a Virus?

Could Your Car’s Computer Be Targeted By a Virus?

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Technical difficulties happen to the best of us. We’ve all experienced the so-called “blue screen of death” when our PC crashes, or else some other computer-related frustration. Viruses are also a big deal and it seems that nary a week goes by without one of my Facebook friends passing on a warning about some new Trojan or worm that some malicious hacker has set loose on the internet. So, as a Dallas-Fort Worth personal injury lawyer, I was naturally intrigued by a report by antivirus software maker MacAfee which suggest that our cars will be hacker’s new targets.

car_virus_fort_worth.png

The report, titled Caution: Malware Ahead, suggests that since automobiles have evolved in recent years they have become increasingly dependent on their on-board computers they could become targets for anarchist technical wizards. The potential problems this could create for people like you and I range from theft since hackers could easily unlock doors and even start engines remotely, to wrecking a car’s computer system so completely it creates a variety of dangers such as brakes not working and other faults which could potentially cause fatal accidents.

Don’t get too concerned just yet though, as The Car Connection points out, the reward for hackers to go after our cars is currently minimal. For starters, in order to access a car’s computer they would actually have to be inside the vehicle. It’s not easy, not quick and results in little benefit. However, as the technology continues to develop and presumably become more integrated between different vehicles and other devises, such a problem could become a genuine problem.

For now, however, this is nothing to worry about. Certainly not in comparison to the very real danger of drunk or distracted drivers.


View the original article here

Rochester Hills lawsuit against bar - injuries of bouncer bar attack could be

Rochester Hills lawsuit against bar - injuries of bouncer bar attack could be

I rode my motorcycle in Detroit when a semi-trailer truck, forced me into an oncoming lane of traffic to roles. I suffered a traumatic brain injury and bone fractures, the operations required. I chose it for Buckfire-& Buckfire for my case and $1,100,000.00. In my opinion they are the best motorcycle accident lawyers in Michigan.
-Michael j. Smith, Waterford, MII chose Larry Buckfire as my medical malpractice lawyer for a wrongful death lawsuit against the VA Hospital in connection with the death of my father. He settled the case before filing a complaint. I will give it the top rating for a medical malpractice attorney of Michigan. He's the best!
-Sharon A., Ann Arbor, MIIf you need a personal injury lawyer in Michigan, I recommend Buckfire & Buckfire P.C. You won a Saginaw nursing home neglect settlement for my father, after the case rejected two other law firms.
-Jeffrey R., Detroit, MIWhen, I was in a Lansing-bicycle accident injured, I chose the company, in my no-fault insurance lawsuit represented me and mean to claim uninsured motorists. They made the insurance company to pay the whole directive and all of my services. If you are looking for the best car accident lawyers in Michigan, call them now!
-Robert M., Lansing, MII malpractice lawyer contacted the firm after researching on the Internet for Michigan. My mother died during surgery at a hospital in Lansing. Larry Buckfire proved that an anaesthesia error was the cause of her death. He won the major settlement in our unlawful death process and we are grateful for his hard work.
-Sherrie H., Chicago, ILAfter are suffering serious injuries in a car accident in Ann Arbor, I wanted the top Michigan auto accident attorney to my case handle. I chose Daniel Buckfire. Each time, when I was with other lawyers in Michigan, someone would say, we were as happy that "best". So thanks again!
-Pat V., Cleveland, OHmore

View the original article here

Stem cell therapy could offer for spinal cord injury victims hope.

Stem cell therapy could offer for spinal cord injury victims hope.

The first FDA study of stem cell research is under way and offers the potential promise of restore sensation and mobility for spinal cord injury (SCI) have been victims, the injury in motor vehicle accidents, construction accidents, and other serious accidents.

A trial is currently in place, to determine whether the infusion made from human embryonic stem cells is restored sensation or mobility of millions of cells in a patient who suffered a serious spinal cord injury (SCI). The current experiment began in July 2010 when he pharmaceutical company Geron received FDA approval, the Menlo Park, California, which is sponsoring the study, to carry out the experiment.

The FDA approved the company to test the stem cell treatment on 10 patients. The procedure involves infusion of about 2 million "oligodendrocyte" surgeons progenitor cells that were created in the laboratory from embryonic stem cells.

The company hopes that the cells a restorative sheath around the spinal cord, with SCI create victims to recover their limbs can use lost and impaired sensation. There were hundreds of similar practices in rats that have succeeded in restoring of mobility in partially paralyzed rats.

The test study restorative ability of stem cells is carried out on those having suffered the severe traumatic spinal cord injury. Timothy Atchison, nursing 21-year-old student from Alabama, suffered a severe spinal cord injury a car collision. While it is too early to determine whether the procedure will be similar results to allow in studies where, yield, rats can the procedure one day, the serious spinal cord injury, the ability to go back suffer.

Despite the potential benefits of the current research is the experiment not without critics. Critics fall into two different groups, including those who have moral objections to the procedure have and those who generally support are stem-cell research but worried that human experimentation is premature. Some critics against stem cell research on moral grounds, because harvesting stem cells involves the destruction of embryos.

Critics who support research on stem cells in General ensure that it is too early for this research. These critics believe that the procedure ineffective or lead to a negative result, such as the development of a tumor that used can be of that, to future stem cells to prevent could experiments. There are also concerns about the use of therapy on spinal cord injury, because victims of such violations often significantly improve without such treatment can complicate the evaluation of the effectiveness of therapy.

Montlick and staff of our experienced Atlanta spinal cord lawyers injuries saw the effects of such violations, emotional hardship and life-changing car accident suffered in Atlanta and Georgia too often. We hope that this new therapy for spinal cord injury future Georgia will offer car collision, hoped the victims. If you or your loved one has suffered a spinal cord injury, you or your love, the compensation for your losses, including medical bills have lost past and future income, compensation for pain and suffering and other losses.

The Atlanta experienced spinal cord injury lawyers Montlick and employees have those representing the suffer this debilitating injuries in Georgia car collisions for more than 27 years. To help our Atlanta spinal cord lawyers are injuries to customers in all Georgia and in the Southeast, including but not limited to Albany, Athens, Atlanta, Augusta, Columbus, Gainesville, Macon, Marietta, Rome, Roswell, Savannah, Smyrna, Valdosta, Warner Robins and all the smaller towns and rural areas in the State. No matter where you are our lawyers are only a phone call away, and we come even to you. Call the week us 24 hours a day/7 days for your free consultation at 1-800-LAW-NEED (1-800-529-6333). You can also visit us at www.montlick.com and use our free case evaluation form or 24-hour live online chat.


View the original article here

Could it be true that women cause more Herndon car crashes?

Could it be true that women cause more Herndon car crashes?

This title called more than likely some feeling, whether you a female driver or not. For, as long as cars have been to, debate it has about a safe driver-is a man or a woman. A recent study only with fuels, this debate and makes, you wonder, which rather lead that a Crash-Herndon caris.

Researchers at the University of Michigan 6.5 million car accidents analyzed and found that woman to woman misses one up to 20.5 percent of all crashes share. This number was much higher than they had expected. Going in the study, researchers believed that the percentage was closer to 15.8 percent.

There were many questions, why more risk of accidents increases women this can be. Of course, most of the statements are based on theories and not hard facts. Some believe for example that it feed vs with nature concept, which means that driving behaviour to do could have the stereotypes that we even regarding to gender. Researchers point out that men usually go do while women as passengers drive. This can lead to less driving experience for women.

This study will likely lead to more jokes about female drivers and give chauvinists further material use.

If you were injured in a car accident, you can recover compensation. To learn more, contact assault a Herndon lawyer. Lawyer to answer your questions and you advise.

Sure, order our free book, five deadly sins, that can wreck your injury claim, and contact your appointment in our new Herndon to our office in 703-591-9829 location to set up.

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]


View the original article here

Oakland crosswalk update could improve pedestrian safety

Oakland crosswalk update could improve pedestrian safety

Posted on Thursday, August 11th, 2011

Here in the Bay area we are happy life in or close to cities, which are known for their ability to walk. Lists the site walk score, for example, recently on place in the most walkable cities in the country, and San Francisco in the second place and Oakland in tenth. This is certainly could lead that for celebration, not security to take into account, when you consider that it was a terrible year for the safety of pedestrians in San Francisco and that more than 550 pedestrian alone kills a year in California. A new account by local blog Oakland North one reason explains why the East Bay City not up to the hype on foot life: dangerous pedestrian crossing signals.

In contrast to most of the cities, the Oaklands crosswalks say not automatically to pedestrians "go", when the light turns green. Rather, pedestrians must press the button on the crosswalk to obtain permissions to the cross. Lauren McFall notes that this creates an inherent conflict between the California vehicle code rule, that "the driver of a vehicle right of way to a pedestrian crossing of the road in all marked crosswalk or all unmarked crosswalk at an intersection yield" and others saying that "no pedestrians will start to cross the road in the direction of the signal" when it says "don't walk" or "wait." By requiring pedestrians to push a button to the road cross, streets are not Oakland pedestrians that grant automatic way, such as those of the California vehicle code.

Fortunately, a simple solution to this problem is dangerous. Oakland could a¼Blicher of the display automatically a "walk" signal, when cars go just or right turn in a transform specific crosswalk adopt. In this way pedestrians must must not care about, whether they cross the road may based on regardless of whether they pressed the. This is an example of a simple solution to a dangerous problem for California streets.

If you agree to the need for this change, McFall invites someone to her in Oakland City Hall on 18 August the bicycle & pedestrian Advisory Committee meeting join.

Photo credit: Dylan Passmore


View the original article here

California Bay area bike paths reduce could car accidents

California Bay area bike paths reduce could car accidents

Posted on Friday, July 29th, 2011

Whether you drive a car or ride a bike, there is no question that security must improve street here in California. 2009 Almost 1,300 people killed accidents were in the car and bicycle accidents here 100 killed in California alone. In accordance with the fatality analysis reporting system mourns California more than 3,000 road deaths per year if you add pedestrian and motor cycles to the mix. Fortunately, the San Jose Mercury reports news, that could all change thanks to a series of street makeovers in the Bay area.


Cities throughout California have proposed traffic plan to ease congestion and roads by reducing vehicle streets in favour of pedestrian spaces and bike paths safe to make. Of course, as confusion in any action which commutes with peoples, these measures have become quickly contentious of debate. Critics say that less vehicle lanes will lead to more traffic with little benefit for the city dwellers. Advocates, point to the other side on studies that show a direct relationship between increased bicycle passenger numbers and lives saved.


Bike-lane advocates also argue that the United States no longer the country half a century ago at cars and Highways had to wed. "Since decades planning focused on the efficient movement of the car", the transport Director Hans Larsen said Department San José. "The result was communities, which are dependent on cars and are not conducive for hiking and biking, and transit."


So if implemented without too much of a public outcry, the transport policies described below could be to cities throughout California place more emphasis on cycling, hiking and around road safety lead. "By design and create more complete streets, to choose people able to walk, drive, bike or take transit", said Chadrick Smalley, Richmond development project manager. "Roads, which are made exclusively often not feasible for car travel approval this election and instead force to drive the people."


Take a look at the streets throughout California, planned reforms as it was from the San Jose Mercury News:

San Jose: High speed one-way streets on the fourth and St. James Street will be converted to two-way streets to bring speed and to facilitate pedestrian traffic.San Francisco: Traffic light on Valencia Street are now the speed of cyclists, not cars. The city has also proposed city rivals cycle paths and new cycling routes to oak and fell streets.Santa Clara: The city is Avenue a trail on the Pruneridge to remove space for a new bicycle path.

The most important development projects are currently in the works. But some few cities in California, Oakland, Hayward, Pleasanton, San Mateo and Redwood City, vamping are also their efforts to improve the bike and vehicle security. Are you friendly efforts for this bike? Let us know what you think in the comments section below or on our Facebook page.


Photo credit: Paul Kruger


View the original article here

Liquid pipe error could future California pipeline explosions cause.

Liquid pipe error could future California pipeline explosions cause.

Posted on Thursday, July 28th, 2011

In September last year, an explosion of the PG & E-pipeline in San Bruno, eight killed and left many more injured. Five years earlier a Walnut Creek explosion killed five workers and about 20 Contra Costa County complaints led. GJEL partner Luke Ellis and Jim Larsen helped the family by Tae Chin ch, a victim of the Walnut Creek pipeline explosion, recover $ 10.65 million. But in a report of this week for the San Jose Mercury News, Ellis expresses concern that one can see California, other tragic explosion due to the location of dangerous liquid pipes. He said "there are a lot of rows, where people do not know, they are in the vicinity of their schools or houses or hospitals,". "You hit one of those things, and to a catastrophic event."


Mercury News reporter Steve Johnson notes that many government officials don't even know the position of some of these dangerous pipes. The Department of transportation reported that led these pipelines between 2005 and 2009 71 "major" accidents, but another study of group common ground Alliance closer sets the number 320 excavation problems in 2009 alone. These types of accidents, on a larger scale can dead and wounded explosions as seriously as the last San Bruno and Walnut Creek.


After the explosion of San Bruno pipeline, the Fire Marshal wrote in a may report that on many State Fire obsolete had"cards and old contacts lists" and provides local officials with cards of their liquid pipelines, despite a federal 1988 law, that they needed, to do so. To solve this problem, Fire Marshal Division Chief Bob Gorham notes that the State of California of an online map of pipelines could set up for emergency officials. The national pipeline mapping system liquid pipes across the country also provides information on the site of many.


Check out the map, to determine whether one is that this dangerous pipelines in your backyard. But cards aside, to seriously reduce the risk of future California pipeline explosions, owners and the Government of safety regulations have and additional steps to ensure that the pipelines to connect, not close to major or potential dig sites such as hospitals and schools.


Photo credit: Rennett Stowe


View the original article here

Sun life could social security award simply not ignore

Sun life could social security award simply not ignore

Receive the latest news.
Posted on November 17, 2009

Sun life lost a case with rheumatoid arthritis. The Court pointed to a favourable social security disability determination and found that because the insurer of the plaintiff had encouraged application it not just could ignore the award of benefits. The Court was also the insurance company confidence to a review stage instead of a test.

Read more about the case against Sun life here.

Read more about Sun life could not ignore social security award... back to top

Note: You should do your own research. This case is shown here only for your interest and information. Legal research should be done by an experienced attorney. Ben glass recommends that you with an experienced, certified speak lawyer Board in your area to your specific case.

View the original article here

Sensors could transport San Jose & motorcycle improve bicycle safety

Sensors could transport San Jose & motorcycle improve bicycle safety

Posted on Monday, June 27th, 2011

We had all moments where it feels like the traffic light will never change in green. Many intersections have sensors under the concrete, which alert the traffic lights when cars to get through. But what if your preferred mode of transportation is hard enough to the sensor trip not? This is the problem for bicycle and motorcycle rider, which all too often change at intersections, not in a position, the light are stranded. That could change eventually, thanks to a pilot program in San Jose, the advanced light technology can cause, which is the presence of a motorcycle or even a bicycle.

San Jose Mercury News reported that the city is a $1.5 million of Metropolitan Transportation Commission grant received the best detectors of bicycles and motorcycles by testing to determine them to San Jose crossings. This results in a four-year-old Bill, requiring that all new or modified traffic lights and bicycles recognize. If the San Jose light pilot program is successful, the technology is probably be applied to cities and towns in the Bay area and California.

Could the problem with waiting at the traffic lights of angry drivers go on two wheels. In fact the Mercury News reported many drivers follow the temptation across through the red light running, if they have waited too long the riders go the other way of the intersection of the surprise and even lead to an accident could take. Cyclists have also said that they frequently in the junction move to move up cars behind them and can trigger the sensor. This leads to overcrowding of intersections and cyclists still more susceptible for reckless drivers could leave.

It is clear that each of traffic lights would benefit, bicycles and motorcycles were the situation to recognize. I have confidence that the San Jose-pilot program will be successful, and if it is, I am pleased to see, better sensors at intersections throughout California.

Photo credit: dno1967b


View the original article here

Could the pathologist of the breast cancer diagnosis was wrong

Could the pathologist of the breast cancer diagnosis was wrong

Monica long was told she had the earliest phase of breast cancer, known as level 0 or Duktales carcinoma in situ (DCIS).  The new according to York Times, a pathologist had come to this conclusion after performing a biopsy.  Mrs long decided, extensive surgery, only later to have to find out that the pathologist had it wrong.  She never had breast cancer.

It is not breaking news.
In 2006 Susan G. Komen for the cure, a survivor of breast cancer organization, published a study with alarming results.  According to the New York Times, these researchers reports that in 90 000 cases, women who were diagnosed with DCIS or invasive breast cancer "not the disease or its pathologist have either an other error that resulted in incorrect treatment."

This 2006 study was, not in isolation. In the year 2002 doctors at Northwestern University Medical Center saw the pathology of 340 patients with breast cancer and discovered that in addition to 8 percent of cases had errors.  These errors were significant enough to change the plans for surgery.

The New York Times pathologist also reported a San Francisco, 597 breast cancer cases from 2007 and 2008 checks found discrepancies in 141 of them.

Were you diagnosed with breast cancer?

If you have been incorrectly diagnosed and have suffered as a result, you should talk medical malpractice lawyer with a Virginia.  It is also important that you details of cases of misconduct by media research. Learn more by ordering a free copy of the book, why the most medical malpractice victims never recover a cent.

* Source: The New York Times, "prone to errors: earliest steps to look for cancer"

One comment to "The pathologist would wrongly have about the breast cancer diagnosis"

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]


View the original article here

Podiatry soon in a position to make diagnoses! Could not she before?

Podiatry soon in a position to make diagnoses! Could not she before?

Podiatry, as currently defined by the Virginia General Assembly includes the medical, mechanical and physical treatment of the foot and ankle. What it was noticeably lacking for some time is the inclusion of the "diagnosis" as part of the practice of podiatry. In other words, under VA code, doctors of Podiatric Medicine (DPMs/podiatry) officially are not able to draw conclusions make on what a foot problem caused, they are simply able to treat them. What is the meant, can testify to that a Podiatrist that an injury was caused by one or the other, as that would be a diagnosis in court not. The production of diagnosis has been reserved until now for MDs.

"So far" da VA General Assembly is finally ready to pass a law that changes the diagnosis include the definition of podiatry, Podiatry liberation a cause foot or ankle injury of witness. I suppose that it makes sense that a DPM (a foot and ankle experts) now officially a foot/ankle diagnosis can make.

The law limited orthopaedic surgeon, as well. Podiatry now won't be able to testify against MD in medical malpractice cases. Basically, this means that only MDs can testify against MDs during MD and DPMs can testify both against podiatrists.

The recent Supreme Court of Virginia case Hollingsworth v. Norfolk Southern, provides the standing of foot specialists and their testimony into question and brings attention to the change.po pending General Assembly

One comment to "Podiatry soon in a position to make diagnoses!" "Could not before?"

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]


View the original article here

Their beliefs about Virginia disability insurance could be wrong.

Their beliefs about Virginia disability insurance could be wrong.

If you have disability insurance through your employer, you probably know that you are in the event that you are working to injured or sick feel be covered.  This is what disability insurance for is not?

What happens, so many people is that if their coverage, disability use time surprised to discover, it is not so easy to use to draw.

Below is a list of common misconceptions about Virginia disability insurance claims.  These may be things you about your disability insurance coverage have believed.

A fair settlement receive offer by the insurance company, as long as you write you a letter and are reasonable with your request.Please fill out everything you need to do, is to get the benefits, insurance and put it in the Post.Sie disability not obtained, have problems even though you have been granted disability social security benefits.The insurer sent that you have a "Activity log" only because they are interested in what you do every day.If you go to court, bear witness to your doctors to convince, in your name and the judge that you are disabled.If your employer says the insurance company that you work are disabled, you will automatically receive benefits.
This list is from my book, sample rape without a gun.  Note for more information on it to order your copy.

One comment to "could your beliefs about Virginia disability insurance be wrong"

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]


View the original article here

Their symptoms are not a joke, & could mean a failure diagnosis in Virginia

Their symptoms are not a joke, & could mean a failure diagnosis in Virginia

In today's society often we look at doctors as the epitome of medical knowledge and with the med school there with good reason, we keep be to a high standard. If we experience any kind of alarming symptoms, we advise with a medical professional to determine the cause and make an appropriate diagnosis expected.

Unfortunately, many doctors do not recognize symptoms for, what they really are, and let you often patients with a misdiagnosis or no Diagnostics on all
Send a patient at home with the mentality of "take 2 aspirin and call me in the morning" has too many wrongful deaths and Schwerverletzte medical due to misconduct.

Pressure, patients from the exam room have led many doctors, severe conditions such as heart attacks, to see contours and blood clots. Diagnose the error conditions in a timely manner is a major cause of wrongful death due to misconduct.

Doctors must be careful when evaluating the symptoms to ensure that they are not signs of serious illness, requires special treatment. Cancer is another frequently reported condition, which diagnose errors in a timely manner due to be treated.

Timely diagnosis and proper treatment of your disease is what we all have, by our medical professionals expect. Diagnose failure is unfortunately still common occurs. If injury occurs as a result, patients have the opportunity to a medical malpractice claim. Her Fairfax medical malpractice lawyer your greatest asset in your application medical malpractice can be, because in such cases without legal assistance prove extremely difficult submission.

Medical malpractice lawyer contact a Fairfax

You do not have to deal with insurance companies and hospitals alone, if you look, to a Virginia medical malpractice case file. Fairfax medical malpractice lawyer Ben glass fights to help pay their medical malpractice claims victims in Virginia and DC.

Before you go no further with your decision, you order a copy of my free guide to the Virginia medical malpractice claims, why most medical malpractice victims never a cent. To set up a free consultation, please contact me 703 591 9829.today-

One comment to "your symptoms are not a joke, & could mean a failure diagnosis in Virginia"

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]


View the original article here

Social media could affect your case?

Social media could affect your case?

Social media is a hot topic among personal injury lawyers and clients alike. Facebook, MySpace and even Twitter all in personal injury claims before come kurzem-and for good reason. Because social media is a relatively new phenomenon, choose dishes on the best way to deal with the information on websites. Since there no set precedent, different courts have treated with social media sites in variety of ways:

In the year 2007 plaintiff Sara piccolo was in an accident and suffered permanent facial scarring. The defence requested access to your Facebook account of a friend request. Piccolo she rejected please, claiming that their account was already visible the public. The defence discovered that her account privacy settings meant that their photos and status updates only for their Facebook friends were available. Their personal injury lawyers claimed that da Piccolo had submitted more than one image - from both before and after the accident - the Court she no obligation was to provide access.In another case, McMillen v. Hummingbird Speedway, Inc., it was found that the plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in social media networks. The case quoted Facebook's privacy policy, claims, that since the site access to all information, which has booked, should not people who sign up for a social media site expect the information remain confidential. The Court declared that will be given access to social media, the Web sites if they contain information that might be relevant to the case.In a decision 2010, the Court determined that if a social media site information, is not with claims in court have, access to social media sites of the plaintiff should be granted. In fact, acting justice Jeffrey Arlen spinner said, "If plaintiff created their Facebook and MySpace account, so she did the fact that your personal information with others, regardless of their privacy settings would be shared." "In fact, this is the nature and purpose of these social networking sites, or they would cease to exist."

Social media and personal injury lawyers


If you are working with New Jersey of injury lawyers in a case, the best tactic of posting-relevant is to avoid information on social media sites as a whole. You can asked to turn information that you have booked, or even full access to the sites. Consult your NJ of injury lawyers on your social media profiles, if you are concerned about your case - they are able to advise on the best course of action.


View the original article here

Social media could affect your case?

Social media could affect your case?

Social media is a hot topic in personal injury lawyers and clients alike. Facebook, MySpace and even Twitter all in personal injury have before complaints come kurzem-and for good reason. Because social media is a relatively new phenomenon, choose dishes on the best way to deal with the information on the sites. Since there no set precedent, different courts have treated with social media sites in variety of ways:

In the year 2007 plaintiff Sara piccolo was in an accident and suffered permanent facial scarring. The defence requested access to your Facebook account of a friend request. Piccolo she rejected please, claims that your account was already visible to the public. The defence discovered that your account privacy settings meant that their photos and status updates only for their Facebook friends were available. Their personal injury lawyers argued that since Piccolo had submitted several pictures – from both before and after the accident - the Court it no obligation was to enable access.In another case, McMillen v. Hummingbird Speedway, Inc., it was found that the plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy on social media networks. The case quoted Facebook's privacy policy, claims that the website has since written to access to any information, should be not people expect that for a social media site the information confidential. The Court declared that will be given access to social media, the Web sites if they contain information that might be relevant to the case.In a decision by 2010, the Court held that if a social media site information, which is not claims in court if necessary have, access to social media sites of the plaintiff should be granted. In fact, acting justice Jeffrey Arlen spinner said "If plaintiff created their Facebook and MySpace account, so she did the fact that their personal information, would be shared with others regardless of their privacy settings." "In fact, this is the nature and the purpose of these social networking sites or they would cease to exist."

Social media and personal injury lawyers

If you are working with New Jersey of injury lawyers in a case, the best tactic of posting is to avoid information on social media sites as a whole. You can asked, turning information that you have booked, or even full access to the sites. Contact New Jersey of injury lawyers to your of your social profiles of media, if you are concerned about your case are you able, you advise on the best course of action.


View the original article here

Podiatrists soon in a position to make Diagnostics! Could not she before?

Podiatrists soon in a position to make Diagnostics! Could not she before?

Podiatry, as currently defined by the Virginia General Assembly includes the medical, mechanical and physical treatment of the foot and ankle. What it was noticeably lacking for some time is the inclusion of the "diagnosis" as part of the practice of podiatry. In other words, under VA code, doctors of Podiatric Medicine (DPMs/podiatrists) officially are not able conclusions make on what is causing a foot problem, they are easy to handle. What does that is meant, that a Podiatrist can testify before the Court that an injury was caused by one or the other, because that would be a diagnosis. The production of diagnosis has been reserved until now for MDs.

"So far" there VA General Assembly is finally ready to pass a law that changes the diagnosis include the definition of the Podiatry, podiatrists share a cause foot or ankle injury of witness. I suppose it makes sense that a DPM (a foot and ankle experts) now officially a diagnosis foot/ankle can make.

The law restricts orthopedists, however. Podiatrists are now unable to testify in cases against MD in medical malpractice. Basically, this means that only MDs can testify against MDs during MD and DPMs can testify both against podiatrists.

The recent Supreme Court of Virginia case Hollingsworth v. Norfolk Southern, is the standing of foot specialists and their testimony into question and brings attention to the General Assembly pending change.po

One comment to "Podiatrists soon in a position to make diagnoses!" "Could not before?"

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]


View the original article here

Sun life could social security award not ignore

Sun life could social security award not ignore


Posted on November 17, 2009

Sun life lost a case with rheumatoid arthritis. The Court pointed to a favourable social security disability determination and found that because the insurer of the plaintiff had encouraged application it not simply could ignore the award of benefits. The Court was also the insurance company depending on file you rather than a test.

You can life here more about this case against Sun.

Read more about Sun life could not ignore social security award... back to top

Note: You should do your own research. This case is shown here only for your interest and information. Legal research should be done by an experienced attorney. Ben glass recommends that you with an experienced, certified speak lawyer Board in your area to your specific case.

View the original article here

Their symptoms are not a joke, & could mean a failure diagnosis in Virginia

Their symptoms are not a joke, & could mean a failure diagnosis in Virginia

In today's society often we look at doctors as the embodiment of medical knowledge, and it is with the med school, the it with good reason, that we to keep them to a high standard. If we experience any kind of alarming symptoms, we consult with a medical professional to determine the cause and make an appropriate diagnosis expected.

Unfortunately, many doctors do not recognize symptoms for what they really are, and let patients with a misdiagnosis or no diagnosis often at all.
Send to many wrongful deaths and medical serious injuries due to a missing a patient with the mentality has "take two aspirin and call me in the morning".

Pressure to patients in and out of the exam room led many doctors, severe conditions such as heart attacks, to see contours and blood clots. Diagnose the error conditions in a timely manner is one of the main causes for the wrongful death due to misconduct.

Doctors must take care when evaluating the symptoms to ensure that it requires no signs of serious illness, the special treatment. Cancer is a more frequently reported condition, diagnose errors in a timely manner due to one is treated.

Timely diagnosis and proper treatment of your disease is what we all come to expect from our medical professionals. Diagnose failure is unfortunately still common occurs. If injury occurs as a result, patients have the option to a medical malpractice claim. Her Fairfax medical malpractice lawyer can be your greatest asset in filing your claim of malpractice, because such cases without legal assistance prove extremely difficult.

Contacting a Fairfax medical malpractice lawyer

You do not have case, with insurance companies and hospitals alone, if you are looking to a Virginia medical malpractice file. Fairfax medical malpractice lawyer Ben glass fights, to pay their medical malpractice claims areas to help victims in Virginia and DC.

Before you go no further with your decision, you order a copy of my free guide to the Virginia medical malpractice claims, why most of the victims never again a medical malpractice cents. To set up a free consultation, please contact me 703-591-9829.today-

One comment to "your symptoms are not a joke, & could mean a failure diagnosis in Virginia"

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]


View the original article here

California car accident costs could reduce spending on the infrastructure.

California car accident costs could reduce spending on the infrastructure.

Posted on Tuesday, May 17, 2011

California is broken, and with budgets stretched thin across the Board, it is difficult to make an effective argument for the increase in expenditure, even if the result is increased security on California roads, to save lives. But a current centers for disease control and prevention report found that California for a full 10% of the country's car accident medical and work loss costs is responsible. With California car accidents it costs far more than any other State is clear, that California actually out of pocket money to save money on infrastructure improvements accidents could reduce.

The CDC report found that of the $41 billion in medical costs in 2005, California much more than the second most expensive state of Texas was responsible for approximately $4.16 billion, $3.50 billion. In some ways, California is already active to improve the safety of drivers, cyclists and pedestrians. San Francisco, for example, the municipal transportation agency has installed green "Bike boxes" to improve the visibility to stop avoidable bike and bicycle accidents. And last week, the SFMTA approved $ 20 million to speeds on Masonic after a string of disturbing pedestrians Avenue to reduce accident deaths.

But some safety advocates say that these measures are also reactive, and that the State only for infrastructure improvements following accident deaths, rather than you to prevent that it is willing to pay in the first place. To appease these critics, California and cities such as San Francisco should similar plans implemented on high traffic streets in the city, rather than focusing exclusively on busy crossroads or streets as symbols of the city accident death problems.

But any improvement should be commended with tight budgets. And if the Masonic Avenue Boulevard plan is successful, could it as an important blueprint serve to reduce the car crash and pedestrian accident deaths in the city and State. If it is effectively duplicated, could cost California as their car accident and save taxpayers a bundle.

Photo credit: Naotakem


View the original article here