Did Patient Die Because Doctor Hung Up Phone?
AppId is over the quota
Posted on Jun 10, 2008
The Supreme Court of Virginia has ordered a new trial for the estate of a woman who died from a pulmonary embolism after information about her life threatening condition was not acted upon by her physicians.
In May 2005 Tawanda Williams was referred to a local radiologist for a sonogram of her calf after she reported calf pain to her doctors at Kaiser Permanente. The radiologist, Vienna physician Cong Le, interpreted the study and concluded that Williams suffered from deep vein thrombosis, a potentially life-threatening condition involving blood clots in her leg. While dangerous, deep vein thrombosis is very amenable to treatment.
According the Supreme Court’s opinion, released June 6, 2008, Le reached an operator at Kaiser and, after identifying himself and asking to speak to Dr. McClain, he was put on hold so long that he “lost confidence to get in touch with [Dr. McClain] at that moment.” He stated that he was unable to leave a voicemail or talk to a human being. Dr. Le testified that previously he had problems communicating with the doctors at Kaiser by telephone. Dr. Le hung up and faxed a report to Dr. McClain.
The information that Tawanda Williams had life threatening blood clots was not acted upon by her doctor and she died six days later.
The Virginia Supreme Court said that “the evidence proved without contradiction that the communication problems in this case were begun and put in motion by Dr. Le’s failure to make direct contact with Dr. McClain, a member of his team, or Williams.” Reversing the trial court’s decision to allow the jury to determine that Dr. Le’s negligence was “cut-off” by Dr. McClain’s failure to read the report that had been faxed to him, the Supreme Court ordered a new trial.
Benjamin W. Glass, III, one of the attorneys who represented the estate said that this case “presents a patient’s worst nightmare—a test is done which shows a condition that is life-threatening but very treatable—but none of the doctors act on the request. Dr. Le should have called back and told the Kaiser operator that he had an emergency on his hands and he should also have called Tawanda Williams and told her to get to an emergency department. He had a time-bomb on his hands yet he failed to communicate the urgency of the situation to the Kaiser operator.”
Glass and his co-counsel, Frank Kearney of Washington, D.C. expect that a new trial will be held in the Spring of 2009. The Supreme Court's opinion is here.
back to top
Bed alarms | Hospital falls | If the patient | Michigan medical malpractice lawyer
-Michael j. Smith, Waterford, MII chose Larry Buckfire as my medical malpractice lawyer for a wrongful death lawsuit against the VA Hospital in connection with the death of my father. He settled the case before filing a complaint. I will give it the top rating for a medical malpractice attorney of Michigan. He's the best!
-Sharon A., Ann Arbor, MIIf you need a personal injury lawyer in Michigan, I recommend Buckfire & Buckfire P.C. You won a Saginaw nursing home neglect settlement for my father, after the case rejected two other law firms.
-Jeffrey R., Detroit, MIWhen, I was in a Lansing-bicycle accident injured, I chose the company, in my no-fault insurance lawsuit represented me and mean to claim uninsured motorists. They made the insurance company to pay the whole directive and all of my services. If you are looking for the best car accident lawyers in Michigan, call them now!
-Robert M., Lansing, MII malpractice lawyer contacted the firm after researching on the Internet for Michigan. My mother died during surgery at a hospital in Lansing. Larry Buckfire proved that an anaesthesia error was the cause of her death. He won the major settlement in our unlawful death process and we are grateful for his hard work.
-Sherrie H., Chicago, ILAfter are suffering serious injuries in a car accident in Ann Arbor, I wanted the top Michigan auto accident attorney to my case handle. I chose Daniel Buckfire. Each time, when I was with other lawyers in Michigan, someone would say, we were as happy that "best". So thanks again!
-Pat V., Cleveland, OHmore
Hospital falls prevention | If the patient | Michigan malpractice lawyer
-Michael j. Smith, Waterford, MII chose Larry Buckfire as my medical malpractice lawyer for a wrongful death lawsuit against the VA Hospital in connection with the death of my father. He settled the case before filing a complaint. I will give it the top rating for a medical malpractice attorney of Michigan. He's the best!
-Sharon A., Ann Arbor, MIIf you need a personal injury lawyer in Michigan, I recommend Buckfire & Buckfire P.C. You won a Saginaw nursing home neglect settlement for my father, after the case rejected two other law firms.
-Jeffrey R., Detroit, MIWhen, I was in a Lansing-bicycle accident injured, I chose the company, in my no-fault insurance lawsuit represented me and mean to claim uninsured motorists. They made the insurance company to pay the whole directive and all of my services. If you are looking for the best car accident lawyers in Michigan, call them now!
-Robert M., Lansing, MII malpractice lawyer contacted the firm after researching on the Internet for Michigan. My mother died during surgery at a hospital in Lansing. Larry Buckfire proved that an anaesthesia error was the cause of her death. He won the major settlement in our unlawful death process and we are grateful for his hard work.
-Sherrie H., Chicago, ILAfter are suffering serious injuries in a car accident in Ann Arbor, I wanted the top Michigan auto accident attorney to my case handle. I chose Daniel Buckfire. Each time, when I was with other lawyers in Michigan, someone would say, we were as happy that "best". So thanks again!
-Pat V., Cleveland, OHmore
A patient who died of sepsis family is awarded $ 1.44 million
Temple, two other doctors and St. Joseph, were named Dr. Richard, in the lawsuit, which was initiated in Baltimore County Circuit Court.
The lawyer represented the Murphy family, Julia R. Arfaa, stated that temple numerous tests carried out, including the an x-ray and CT scan. Arfaa said that these tests have shown that Murphy is suffering from sepsis. He died one day after he was admitted to the hospital.
According to Ronald Shaw, Temple, the lawyer, the doctor, Murphy believed some sort of infection, such as such as pneumonia. Temple Murphy treated with a broad-spectrum antibiotic and included him in the hospital. Shaw said that temple at the time, considered sepsis but not sure about a source. He said that temple was appropriate treatment and that Murphy for several days before he had been sick in the hospital.
"He sees patients with a variety of problems." He makes a first diagnosis and decides to send to the hospital, "Shaw said.
St. Joseph and the other two doctors, was settled out of court.
One comment to "Family of a patient who died of sepsis 1.44 million is awarded"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
Hospital thwarts attempt, stunning facts of the death of the patient hide
According to blog posts by lawyer Sandy Waterman the Hospital claimed that a woman was "mysterious". It further disclosed that created a problem report about the death of woman, but it was "irrelevant to the facts about the death of woman."
The Virginia misconduct messages read and then Waterman's blog posts and make your own decision about whether the cards playing this defendant is "just".
One comment to "hospital in hide stunning facts of patient death attempt thwarted"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
Is it Virginia medical malpractice, if surgical objects were links within the patient?
There are many urban legends and rumors circulating in the Internet about patients, find out, their doctor them sewn and crazy things such as watches and whole scalpels left in their bodies. While these stories can be produced, or a little extreme, the truth is that objects within op patients are often left.
Some of the objects often left behind after surgery include:
Sponges and gauze are links in the body of the patient after surgery the most common of all objects. This is because the simple compress in cuts, so she are easily missed. Also, they tend to merge, since it often on the color of liquids, which absorb it with the surrounding tissue. Some techniques include hundreds of sponges, includeand keep track of all of them quite difficult to make.
The surgical nurses are usually the ones, the number of the sponges used and accessed in a procedure to keep not the surgeon who actually use them. This allows more room for error, if the person, the application of the sponge is not that you make sure that it removed and made tips for In recent years of new technology such as such as radio frequency identification (RFID) were used to allow sponges within the body can be scanned and removed before the cut is closed.
Unfortunately, the new sponges are part of a system that expensive to implement for some hospitals, and it has no standard. Sponges are only one of the many objects that can be left inside the body after the operation, which may result in the need for a medical malpractice claim.
Medical malpractice lawyer contact a Fairfax
You have to deal with insurance companies and hospitals alone, if you are looking to a medical malpractice file claim in Virginia. Fairfax medical malpractice lawyer Ben glass fights to help pay their medical malpractice claims victims in Virginia and DC.
Before you go no further with your decision, you order a copy of my free guide to the Virginia medical malpractice claims, why most medical malpractice victims never a cent. To set up a free consultation, please contact me 703 591 9829.today-
One comment to "is it Virginia medical malpractice if surgical objects were links within the patient?"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
Insurers wanted to not the responsibility of the patient wrong site surgery to take
What would have been a routine surgery, turned into a fiasco. The nurses in Surgery Center prepared the patient's back shoulder surgery. The problem started however after Mrs Fincher was under anesthesia. Dr. Snedden examines the two sides of the shoulder and the Lipoma is not found. After examination, he decided the MRI carried out previously, that the lump was the shoulder on the front, in spite of, that a radiologist had reported that the was Lipoma on back.
Dr. Snedden was tried on a research find the Lipoma. He split unnecessary muscles and tissues. In all, the investigation and decomposition of tissues and muscles, the Lipoma is not removed.
Mrs Fincher again Sneddens Office the next day. If was removed the dressing, you could see even the Lipoma. Dr. Snedden admitted to the mistake. The surgeon medical malpractice insurance company but claimed that the surgeon wrong nothing have, not the patient attempt, the event rules.
While this could be a smaller medical malpractice case, Mrs Fincher wants to make a point. You have to get up and responsibility to assume, if you make a mistake.
Here's my take - we have something and, that something is not for tort reform cry and refuse to valid claims.
One comment to "non insurers want the responsibility of patients wrong site surgery to take over"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
A patient who died sepsis family awarded $ 1.44 million
Temple, two other doctors and St. Joseph, were named in the lawsuit, which was initiated in Baltimore County Circuit Court Dr. Richard.
The lawyer represented the Murphy family, Julia R. Arfaa, stated that temple carried out numerous tests, including an x ray and CT scan. Arfaa said that these tests have shown that Murphy is suffering from sepsis. He died one day after he was admitted to the hospital.
According to Ronald Shaw, Temple, the lawyer, the doctor, Murphy believed some sort of infection, such as such as pneumonia. Temple Murphy treated with a broad-spectrum antibiotic and included him in the hospital. Shaw said that temple had sepsis at the time as, but not sure about a source. He said that temple was appropriate treatment and that Murphy for several days before he had been sick in the hospital.
"Does he see patients with a variety of problems." He makes a first diagnosis and decides to send to the hospital, "said Shaw."
St. Joseph and the other two physicians was settled out of court.
One comment to "Family of a patient who died of sepsis $ 1.44 million is awarded"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]
Hospital thwarts attempt, stunning facts in the death of the patient hide
According to blog posts by lawyer Sandy Waterman the Hospital claimed that a woman was "mysterious". It further exposed, creating a problem report about the woman's death, but that it "irrelevant for the facts about the woman's death."
The Virginia misconduct messages read and then Waterman's blog posts and make your own decision about whether the cards play this defendant is "straight".
One comment to "hospital in hide stunning facts of patient death attempt thwarted"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]
Insurers wanted not the responsibility of the patient wrong site surgery to take
What would have been a routine surgery, turned into a fiasco. The nurses in the Surgery Center prepared the back of the shoulder of the patient for surgery. The problem started however after Mrs Fincher was under anesthesia. Dr. Snedden examined both sides of the shoulder and the Lipoma is not found. After examination, he decided the MRI carried out previously, that the lump was the shoulder on the front, in spite of, that a radiologist had reported that the was Lipoma on the back.
Dr. Snedden was trying on a study find the Lipoma. He split unnecessary muscles and tissues. In all, the investigation and decomposition of tissues and muscles, the Lipoma is not removed.
Mrs Fincher back to Snedden's Office the next day. If the dressing was removed so she could see even the Lipoma. Dr. Snedden allowed on the error. However requires medical malpractice insurance company of surgeons that the surgeon wrong nothing have, not the patients attempt to settle the case.
While this may be a smaller medical malpractice case, Mrs Fincher would like to make a point. You have to stand up and take responsibility if you make a mistake.
Here is my take - we have something available and, that something is not for tort reform scream and deny valid claims.
One comment to "Insurers wanted to take in patient's wrong site surgery case responsibility"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]
Is it Virginia medical malpractice if surgical objects were links within the patient?
There are many urban legends and rumors circulating in the Internet about patients, find out, their doctor them up sewn and crazy things such as watches and whole scalpels left in their bodies. While these stories can be made, or a little extreme, the truth is that objects within op patients are often left.
Some of the objects often behind left after surgery include:
Sponges and gauze are links in the body of the patient after surgery the most common of all objects. This is because the simple you compress in cuts, so she are easily missed. Also, they tend it, with the surrounding tissue as often on the color of the liquids that absorb them merge. Some techniques include hundreds of sponges, includeand keep track of all of them quite difficult to make.
The surgical nurses are usually the ones, the number of the sponges used and retrieved in a procedure to keep not the surgeon who actually use them. This leaves more room for error, if the person is not in favour of applying the sponge that it removed and made for... In recent years of new technology such as such as radio frequency identification (RFID) were used to allow sponges within the body can be scanned and removed before the cut is closed.
Unfortunately, the new sponges are part of a system that is expensive to implement is for some hospitals, and it has become a standard. Sponges are only one of the many objects that can be left inside the body after surgery which may result in the need for a medical malpractice claim.
Contacting a Fairfax medical malpractice lawyer
You don't have to deal with if you are looking to a medical malpractice insurance companies and hospitals only file claim in Virginia. Fairfax medical malpractice lawyer Ben glass fights, to pay their medical malpractice claims areas to help victims in Virginia and DC.
Before you go no further with your decision, you order a copy of my free guide to the Virginia medical malpractice claims, why most of the victims never again a medical malpractice cents. To set up a free consultation, please contact me 703-591-9829.today-
One comment to "it is Virginia medical malpractice if surgical objects were links within the patient?"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]
