Virginia Med time plaintiffs allows 1.8 million US-dollar-jury award legal costs to
Wendell Waggener claimed neck surgical services, filed a lawsuit against Dr. Steven j. Oltermann and Northern Oltermann to diagnose not colonic obstruction and carry out an emergency procedure in a timely manner. The jury awarded Waggener represented lawyer John petty, $2 million from Richmond the 1.8 million by the cap on medical malpractice damages was dropped.
Waggener requested an award for $2,706.88 in legal expenses, but the defendants objected against his request. The accused made the argument that the State prohibited the Federal Court, statutory damage Cap taxation costs pursuant to fed. R. CIV-P.54(d), since the verdict on the CAP would go until then.
US District Judge Robert Payne rejected the defendant claim that the allocation of the costs of the plaintiff would push higher than Virginia's Cap price. Federal courts firmly according to Payne continuously, that taxation of costs is a question of the Federal Republic of, not state is substantive law.
Petty, said that he could find any comments in federal or State Court on this issue.
One comment to "allows Virginia Med time plaintiff costs add $1.8 million jury award"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
Virginia Med time allows plaintiffs $1.8 million jury award court costs to
Wendell Waggener had claimed neck surgical services, filed a lawsuit against Dr. Steven j. Oltermann and Northern Oltermann to disability diagnose no colon and perform an emergency procedure in a timely manner. The jury awarded Waggener, was representing Attorney John petty, $2 million, from Richmond the 1.8 million by the cap on malpractice damages was dropped.
Waggener requested an award for $2,706.88 in legal expenses the defendant against his motion, but. The accused made the argument that the banned state statutory damage cap the Federal Court, taxation costs pursuant to fed. R. CIV P.54(d), because the verdict on which CAP would go until then.
US District Judge Robert Payne rejected the defendant claim that the allocation of the costs of the plaintiff would later as Virginia's Cap Press Award. Federal courts firmly according to Payne continuously, that taxation of costs is a question of the Federal Republic of, not state is substantive law.
Petty said he was all not able find opinions in federal or State Court documents.
One comment to "allow Virginia Med time plaintiff, court costs add $1.8 million jury award"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]
