Man Involved in Deadly Crash While Talking on Cell Could Face Homicide Charges
AppId is over the quota
October 26, 2011 - You know, I see police on their cell phone all the time and frankly, this is absurd. Since when did the servants become our masters? So, it is with baited breath that I bring this discussion. According to reports a driver involved in a deadly crash, while talking on a cell phone could be facing homicide charges.
Now, here the facts are that the cell phone prompted the cop to make a stop. According to Concord Police 25 year old Mauro Gutierrez was seen by a Concord police officer talking on a cell phone without a hands free device on Hillsdale Drive, in the vicinity of Overhill Road at approximately 5:45 on Tuesday.
So, the selective enforcement of this law, led to a death. The officer attempted to stop Guiterrez, which turned into a chase southbound on Grant Street until the Highway 242 off ramp. This is where Guiterrez struck another vehicle resulting in the death of the driver of that vehicle.
Gutierrez then attempted to run and was caught approximately a block away from the crash. The 25 year old was arrested and allegedly was in possession of an illegal handgun. According to Concord Police, Gutierrez could be charged with second degree murder and will most likely face other charges for driving recklessly, fleeing from a police officer and violating the cell phone hands free law. The identity of the driver that was killed in the collision has not been released pending notification of their family. What do you think? Do you see my point about how the government needs to know the law and keep it well?
Anyways, I have been discussing these types of cases as a speaker for the personal injury attorneys at Ehline Law Firm PC at 633 West Fifth Street, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071. 213.596.9642. Whether a motorcycle accident, or wrongful death, negligence it was propels your injury claims.
Doctors are apparently talking about "Defensive medicine"
A study was published in the June 28th issue of archives of internal medicine that showed "91% of physician practice defensive medicine." In reality, this was a survey of 2,416 doctors asked are whether it with a few instructions match. This figure "91 %" was not on medical records or some other specific fact based; It has been calculated based on doctors reviews.
In March 2010, Medscape.com an article, physicians are talking about published: the culture of defensive medicine. They contain information from an all physician discussion group, that the question - asked had "do defensive medicine practice?"
A neurologist said, "here in the Southern Michigan, home to the (well-known) misconduct by lawyers, we defensive medicine every day with every patient practice."
A radiologist, was quoted in the article words: "defensive medicine is practiced everywhere, everyday." "And the costs have to be to simply enormous."
There are many attempts to prove defensive medicine with the visit and general comments. However I must that based show to read something on medical records, that tests, justified by the medical conditions were not, were ordered. If the medical community is defensive medicine is going to say is, why offer to prove them to their medical history?
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
Doctors are apparently talking about "Defensive medicine"
Published a study was in the June 28th issue of the archives of internal medicine, showed "91% of physician practice defensive medicine." In reality, this was a survey of 2,416 doctors be asked whether it with a few instructions match. This figure "91 %" was not on medical records or some other specific fact are based; It has been calculated reviews based on doctors.
In March 2010, Medscape.com published an article, physicians are talking about: the culture of defensive medicine. They contain information from an all physician discussion group, that the question - asked was "do defensive medicine practice?"
A neurologist said, "here in the Southern Michigan, home of the (known) misconduct by lawyers, we defensive medicine every day with every patient practice."
A radiologist, was quoted in the article words: "defensive medicine is practiced everywhere, everyday." "And the costs have to be to simply enormous."
There are many attempts to prove defensive medicine with review and general opinions. However, I have to read something that is based, which point to medical records, that tests, justified by the medical conditions were not, were ordered. If the medical community is defensive medicine is going to say is, why offer to show them to their medical history?
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]
