If you should the agreement associated with the Apple iPhone like you went only have
A federal judge has a case against Apple and AT & T move allowed as a class-action. The companies are accused of monopoly abuse. Several will consolidate this suit was filed by consumers, the iPhone in early 2007 acquired.
Here are some of the questions that are raised in this ridiculous lawsuit:
The height of the control, the Apple of the applications of iPhone owners has allowed to install on their devices.Apple's practice of "lock" iPhones's so that she could be used only on AT & T Netzwerk.Die claim that Apple secretly AT & T its exclusive iPhone partner in the United States for five years made.Consumers agreed two-year contract with the carrier, but were "effectively locked in a five-year relationship with AT & T."These actions of the company violates "allegedly competition and drove the prices for the consumer."According to court documents, parts of the complaint, violations of antitrust law continued address to the as class action. The class includes all consumers, the iPhone with a two-year-acquired AT & T contract since June 2007.
This complaint is stupid. If you didn't like the idea of a two year agreement with AT & T, which was apparently required to get the iPhone, you went away just have. This is Apple's business. The decision to buy an iPhone is completely voluntary.
One comment to "When did not like the agreement have associated with the iPhone, Apple, you should just go away"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]
0 comentarios:
Publicar un comentario