Receive the latest news.
Posted on October 22, 2009

In this case from Federal Court in Connecticut prudential had based on fibromyalgia claim denied. Prudential had Paul supported himself on Dr. Howard and its analysis, containing a statement which "the pain of fibromyalgia is never sufficient to lead to a qualifying disability." This particular position has refuted time and again.

The Court said that prudential sole reliance on Dr. Howard articulated report, a test for disability, debilitating Fibromyalgia never caused pain a determining arbitrary and capricious eligibility constituted could qualify. In short the Court rejected the prudential claim, regardless of, how strong is the pain of fibromyalgia that cannot be disabled.

This case is Lanoue v. prudential insurance co. of America, and it was decided, September 25, 2009.

back to top

Note: You should do your own research. This case is shown here only for your interest and information. Legal research should be done by an experienced attorney. Ben glass recommends that you with an experienced, certified speak lawyer Board in your area to your specific case.

View the original article here