VA workers comp Commission rules Facebook are protected

VA workers comp Commission rules Facebook are protected

server temporarily unavailable
Eine kürzlich erschienenen Artikel in Richmond Zeiten-Dispatch unterstreicht die aufkeimende Welt der Technologie und die Möglichkeiten, in denen das Gesetz versucht, aufzuholen. Der Artikel konzentriert sich auf ein kürzlich Virginia Arbeiter Entschädigung Kommission Fall in dem Facebook vorgeladen wurde, um die persönliche Informationen des eines Arbeitnehmers Comp Ansprechers.

Facebook verweigerte mit die Vorladung (zu einem Preis von $ 200/Tag), dass es die Privatleben-Vereinbarung auf der Website ungültig würde, dass sie geschützt wurden an den Bundesgesetze, die Veröffentlichung von Informationen über das Verbot und der Prinzipal, der die Website "auf Vertrauen aufbaut" und um zu geben, um die Vorladung der Website nach untergraben würde.

Deputy Commissioner, Randolph Tabb, vereinbart mit Facebook, dass die Bundesrepublik Electronic Communications Privacy Act des Mitglieds der Website geschützt und ihre Informationen konnte nicht durch Vorladung erreicht werden.

Mit Technologie und sozialen Medien immer immer präsent in unserem Leben ist es interessant zu sehen, wie die Gerichte auf die Veränderungen und Fortschritte einstellen. In diesem Fall der Kläger ging voran und erlaubt Zugriff auf ihre Informationen wie auch immer, aber wer nicht will, ist jetzt geschützt. Hier ist ein Link zum Artikel auf Facebook gegen die Vorladung.

Nachricht:

Benachrichtigen Sie mich über Follow-up-Kommentare per e-Mail.

Aus Sicherheitsgründen geben Sie den Grafik-Text in das Feld unten: [drücken Sie F5, wenn Sie den Text nicht lesen können]


View the original article here

Joint Commission works to prevent wrong site surgery

Joint Commission works to prevent wrong site surgery


Posted on Jul 21, 2010

The Joint Commission Board of Commissioners originally approved the universal protocol for wrong site prevent wrong procedure and wrong person SurgeryTM in July 2003, and it joined 1 July 2004 for all accredited hospitals, ambulatory care and Office-based surgery facilities. The universal protocol was created to the continuing occurrence of wrong site, wrong procedure and surgery in Joint Commission accredited organizations address wrong person. The universal Protocol to moved and expanded and integrated a number of requirements under the Joint Commission in 2003 and 2004 national patient safety goals. There are three main components of the universal Protocol: conducting a preprocedure verification process, marking the procedure site, and a timeout before the procedure to perform.

back to top


View the original article here

Joint Commission works to prevent wrong site surgery

Joint Commission works to prevent wrong site surgery


Posted on Jul 21, 2010

The Joint Commission Board of Commissioners originally approved the universal protocol for wrong site prevent wrong procedure and wrong person SurgeryTM in July 2003, and it joined 1 July 2004 for all accredited hospitals, ambulatory care and Office-based surgery facilities. The universal protocol was created to the continuing occurrence of wrong site, wrong procedure and surgery in Joint Commission accredited organizations address wrong person. The universal Protocol to moved and expanded and integrated a number of requirements under the Joint Commission in 2003 and 2004 national patient safety goals. There are three main components of the universal Protocol: conducting a preprocedure verification process, marking the procedure site, and a timeout before the procedure to perform.

back to top


View the original article here

Joint Commission works to prevent wrong site surgery

Joint Commission works to prevent wrong site surgery


Posted on Jul 21, 2010

The Joint Commission Board of Commissioners originally approved the universal protocol for wrong site prevent wrong procedure and wrong person SurgeryTM in July 2003, and it was 1 July 2004 for all accredited hospitals, out-patient care and Office based surgery facilities. The universal protocol was created to the continuing occurrence of wrong site, wrong procedure and surgery in Joint Commission accredited organizations address wrong person. The universal Protocol to moved and expanded and integrated a number of requirements in the framework of the Joint Commission in 2003 and 2004 national patient safety goals. There are three main components of the universal Protocol: conducting a preprocedure verification process, marking the procedure site, and a timeout before the procedure to perform.

back to top


View the original article here

Joint Commission works to prevent wrong site surgery

Joint Commission works to prevent wrong site surgery


Posted on Jul 21, 2010

The Joint Commission Board of Commissioners originally approved the universal protocol for wrong site prevent wrong procedure and wrong person SurgeryTM in July 2003, and it was 1 July 2004 for all accredited hospitals, out-patient care and Office based surgery facilities. The universal protocol was created to the continuing occurrence of wrong site, wrong procedure and surgery in Joint Commission accredited organizations address wrong person. The universal Protocol to moved and expanded and integrated a number of requirements in the framework of the Joint Commission in 2003 and 2004 national patient safety goals. There are three main components of the universal Protocol: conducting a preprocedure verification process, marking the procedure site, and a timeout before the procedure to perform.

back to top


View the original article here

VA workers comp Commission rules Facebook are protected

VA workers comp Commission rules Facebook are protected

A recent article in the Richmond Times-Dispatch underscores the burgeoning world of technology and the ways in which the law trying to catch up. The article focuses on a recent Virginia worker compensation Commission case in Facebook, the personal information of a worker's comp claimant was summoned.

Facebook refused with the subpoena (at a cost of $200 / day) on the grounds, that it would void the privacy agreement on the website, that they were protected to the federal statute release and the principal "on trust founded the website" and would undermine basis to give to the subpoena of the site prohibits information.

The Deputy Commissioner, Randolph Tabb, agreed with Facebook, because the Federal of electronic communications protected member of your site and their information could be achieved Privacy Act not by subpoena.

With technology and social media always always present in our life interesting to see it, such as the courts, to adapt to the changes and progress is. In this case the plaintiff went ahead and allows access to its information anyway, but if you do not want, is now protected. Here is a link to the article on Facebook against the subpoena.

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]


View the original article here