Seattle Pedestrian Accident Lawyer | Woman Struck By Smart Car
AppId is over the quota
As a Seattle pedestrian collision attorney, I realize that walking in a vehicle dominated society can be very dangerous. According to the Seattle Police Department Blotter, on the morning of October 17th, an elderly pedestrian was hit by a Smart car. The Smart Car driver, a 29- year-old woman, was traveling southbound on 18th Ave, when a 73-year-old woman who was walking eastbound in the crosswalk was struck by the car. The pedestrian was unconscious when help arrived and was transported by Seattle Fire Department to Harborview Medical Center for medical treatment, her injuries were unknown. The police are ruling alcohol out as a factor but are still investigating the incident. Pedestrians have rights just as other drivers on the road do and I will commit to fighting for your rights.
Pedestrian collisions can be the fault of a pedestrian infraction or the negligence of the driver. According to Walking in Seattle, the Seattle Department of Transportation said in 2009 that there were 479 pedestrian collisions in Seattle that year. The most common pedestrian infractions were jaywalking and failure to use crosswalks. Although these were common among the pedestrians, the drivers were most often to blame with failure to yield to the right of way to pedestrians. Pedestrians need to be careful and be mindful of the laws just as much as drivers need to be.
If you or a family member have been injured in a Seattle pedestrian collision, you need the professional services of a dedicated Seattle pedestrian collision attorney. Call me at Premier Law Group and I will dedicate my time to your case in order to ensure you the medical care that you deserve. I can also work with your insurance company to get you everything you are entitled to. I believe that everyone has the right to the road. For more information and a FREE CONSULTATION, contact me at (206)285-1743.
Tags: 73 year old woman hit by smart car, bellevue personal injury lawyer, elderly pedestrian hit by smart car, elderly pedestrian hit in crosswalk, Everett personal injury attorney, pedestrian hit by smart car, Seattle pedestrian accident attorney, seattle pedestrian hit by smart car, Seattle pedestrian injury lawyer
Tweet
Can you traffic to detect smart phone app, but add you distracted driving also?
WAZE, a new Smartphone application, the social media traffic updates in the form of you can map to avoid zones in DFW to drive it also aid for distracted but car accidents and construction? In addition to always automatic feeds of news channels such as WFAA channel 8, the whole point of open and your own contributions add app is when and where you see road obstacles.
Done the creator of WAZE have for their part, to prevent the apps users from distraction while driving. If the app is open and the vehicle is more than 5 mph, the SMS-functionality for the phone are disabled, although users still on the screen, may tap to see on the map.
While our personal injury accidents know causes driving lawyers of the law firm Anderson distracted, we also know that to do traffic and construction. This app, like any GPS or other traffic Tracker is correctly used a useful tool if you.
When a distracted driving injured you, give a call our lawyers in Fort Worth. One of our specialties is representing, the victims of car accidents by distracted driver causes - we have even created their own distracted driving initiative to drive young people against distracted, to grow awareness for this issue. If you need help after your car accident, please contact us for all the answers.
Prevent Smart cars Georgia serious car accidents?
Intel Corporation hat ein Ziel, ein wirklich intelligent Auto zu entwickeln. Ein "smart" Auto, wenn man so will, sammeln, die seinen Namen für die Daten, die es sammeln kann, nicht nur die großen Kraftstoffmeilenzahl wird es. Ihre Vision ist es, dass eines Tages wird es ein Auto, das auf eigene Entscheidungen trifft.
Sie sind derzeit in der Entwicklung eines Autos mit "Black Box" Technologie, wie die, die setzen sie im Flugzeug. Dieses kleine Blackbox befindet sich im Auto zeichnet Daten über Fahrzeuggeschwindigkeit, Lenkung und Bremsen. Es werden auch Kameras innerhalb des Wagens, die aufgezeichnet werden, was im Inneren des Fahrzeugs und aussen vor sich geht. Wenn das Auto in einen Unfall verwickelt war, würde den Videoaufnahmen von der Kameras und die Informationen von den Black-Box automatisch an die Polizei-Abteilung und die Versicherungsgesellschaft geschickt erhalten.
Die Idee hinter diesem ist, dass es helfen würde, bei der Bestimmung, die bei einem Autounfall fehlerhaft ist. Die langfristige Vision, die sie haben ist ein Auto mit Kamerasystemen darin, die tatsächlich Straßenschilder und Ampeln erkennen können. Wenn der Treiber etwas Illegales, wie Laufwerk durch ein rotes Licht tun wollten, wäre das Auto in der Lage zu übernehmen und den Treiber daran hindern. Dies würde durch Schaffung eines Netzwerkes, wo alle Autos sind dauerhaft mit dem Internet verbunden und auch an der anderen Fahrzeuge auf der Straße, erreicht werden.
Eine Gruppe von Autohersteller, einschließlich Ford und Toyota, entwickeln Technologie, die erlaubt Autos mit einander kommunizieren und warnen Fahrer. Dieses System, genannt Intellidrive, beschäftigt GPS-Sender und Wi-Fi, ständig zu übertragen Signale mit Position und Geschwindigkeit des Autos. Wenn ein Treiber sich einer Kreuzung nähert und ein anderes Auto ist ein rotes Licht ausgeführt, warne das Auto System den Treiber, schlagen die Bremsen, die Kollision zu vermeiden. Dieses System ist definitiv ein bisschen weniger invasive als Kameras im Auto oder haben Ihr Auto-Laufwerk für Sie.
Es bleibt die Frage, ob diese Art von Technologie wirklich machen würde Autofahren sicherer. Autos, im Gegensatz zum Menschen, werden halten immer intelligentere und aus ihren Fehlern lernen. Sie werden nicht von Handy-Telefonaten, Laufwerk betrunken oder Geschwindigkeit ablenken erhalten. Smart-Autos können niemals perfekt sein, aber sie haben keine perfekte Georgien Auto-Unfall-Risiken zu verringern werden. Smart-Autos müssen nur besser als die Treiber, die sind aus gibt es jetzt, aus fahren Störungen und töten eine Million ihre Mitbürger jedes Jahr.
Bis der Tag eingeht Wenn Autos selbst steuern sind und miteinander kommunizieren, sind die Menschen noch in dem Fahrersitz. Während im Steuerelement bleiben, wird menschlicher Fehler weiterhin ernsthafte Georgien Autounfälle auf einer täglichen Basis verursachen.
Wenn Sie oder eines geliebten Menschen schwer verletzt hat oder ein Mitglied der Familie bei einem Autounfall Georgien getötet wurde, sollten Sie die Georgien-Auto-Unfall-Anwälte von Montlick und Mitarbeiter Kontakt. Unsere erfahrenen Georgien-Auto-Unfall-Anwälte stehen den Kunden in ganz Georgien und im Südosten, einschließlich aber nicht beschränkt auf Albany, Athen, Atlanta, Augusta, Columbus, Gainesville, Macon, Marietta, Rom, Roswell, Savannah, Smyrna, Valdosta, Warner Robins und alle kleineren Städten und ländlichen Gebieten in den Zustand zu helfen. Egal wo Sie sich befinden unserer Rechtsanwälte sind nur einen Telefonanruf entfernt, und wir kommen sogar zu Ihnen. Rufen Sie uns 24 Stunden pro Tag/7 Tage die Woche für Ihre kostenlose Beratung bei 1-800-LAW-NEED (1-800-529-6333). Sie können auch besuchen Sie uns online unter www.montlick.com und die Verwendung unserer freien Fall Auswertungsbogen oder 24-Stunden Live Online Chat.
Smart key was at a different death
FORT LAUDERDALE (CN) - a woman blames Toyota for her daughter death from carbon monoxide poisoning, because its smart key system Lexus occurred in the background without a key in the ignition. Toyota compared to a similar complaint in New York City in October last year.
Kimberlin Nickles sued Toyota and car dealers of JM Lexus in Broward County Court. You sued also Marbella premium apartments, where her daughter lived to make if a safe ventilation system.
Nickles says her daughter, Chasity Glisson, their Lexus garage parked below their townhouse and accidentally left it running. Says Glisson "either accidentally forget the engine of the vehicle, subject shut down or pushed, start/stop button in an effort to do so but was not successful."
"Probably after the finishing of the vehicle, the applicant missed Chasity Glisson, did not know that the subject vehicle was running, if you your House with the Keyring type." "For information and believe Toyota designs the topic model vehicle engine virtually silent and be smooth, and as a result of the plaintiff missing, Chasity Glisson, could not listen as they exit the vehicle idle engine and with the key chain entered their house."
Nickles says worried family and friends if they hear not, co-plaintiff Timothy Maddock of Glisson and their companions. You alerted the police, that the next evening, Glisson "with no pulse or breathing" to find apartment entered and Maddock "can not speak or move."
Glisson died of carbon monoxide poisoning, and Maddock suffered debilitating injuries.
Nickles says that "electronic key system, a change to basic and ingrained behaviour requires new technologies such as Toyota's." For example, consumers have to the electronic key system no longer turns the key and remove from the ignition. This can cause running the vehicle predictable failures, as for example accidentally left after the exit of the automobile.
"In addition, this keyless ignition technology accidentally the keychain from the vehicle to remove an operator, while the vehicle is in progress allows."
Toyota smart key technology used a computerized keyless device send signals to an antenna inside the vehicle, to start the car.
Nickles says, "the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration several complaints from consumers who stopped their cars with the key chain on their person and accidentally left the vehicle's engine has received running."
A woman in Queens, New York, filed a similar lawsuit in October 2010, claiming she her partner was killed, and she was permanently injured in the same scenario.,
Nickles adds: "as ' smart key'-technology is a convenience function and, in General, new technology that allows to create an operator to remove the key ring from the vehicle while the vehicle is running, it certain vulnerabilities that do not exist with traditional key technology, including the risk of carbon monoxide gas from the vehicle while the driver spent wirdzusammen with the keys no longer in the vehicle are."
She says Toyota ignores these "foreseeable risks" and not "one install automatic shutdown or shutdown switch sheets in the case of a consumer inadvertently the vehicle with the key chain on their person executed."
You are seeking damages for wrongful death, negligence and product liability. It is of personal injury lawyer represented Robert Kelley with Kelley Uustal.
View the original article by courthouse news service, please click here.
Smart key was at a different death
FORT LAUDERDALE (CN) - a woman blames Toyota for her daughter death from carbon monoxide poisoning, because its smart key system Lexus occurred in the background without a key in the ignition. Toyota compared to a similar complaint in New York City in October last year.
Kimberlin Nickles sued Toyota and car dealers of JM Lexus in Broward County Court. You sued also Marbella premium apartments, where her daughter lived to make if a safe ventilation system.
Nickles says her daughter, Chasity Glisson, their Lexus garage parked below their townhouse and accidentally left it running. Says Glisson "either accidentally forget the engine of the vehicle, subject shut down or pushed, start/stop button in an effort to do so but was not successful."
"Probably after the finishing of the vehicle, the applicant missed Chasity Glisson, did not know that the subject vehicle was running, if you your House with the Keyring type." "For information and believe Toyota designs the topic model vehicle engine virtually silent and be smooth, and as a result of the plaintiff missing, Chasity Glisson, could not listen as they exit the vehicle idle engine and with the key chain entered their house."
Nickles says worried family and friends if they hear not, co-plaintiff Timothy Maddock of Glisson and their companions. You alerted the police, that the next evening, Glisson "with no pulse or breathing" to find apartment entered and Maddock "can not speak or move."
Glisson died of carbon monoxide poisoning, and Maddock suffered debilitating injuries.
Nickles says that "electronic key system, a change to basic and ingrained behaviour requires new technologies such as Toyota's." For example, consumers have to the electronic key system no longer turns the key and remove from the ignition. This can cause running the vehicle predictable failures, as for example accidentally left after the exit of the automobile.
"In addition, this keyless ignition technology accidentally the keychain from the vehicle to remove an operator, while the vehicle is in progress allows."
Toyota smart key technology used a computerized keyless device send signals to an antenna inside the vehicle, to start the car.
Nickles says, "the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration several complaints from consumers who stopped their cars with the key chain on their person and accidentally left the vehicle's engine has received running."
A woman in Queens, New York, filed a similar lawsuit in October 2010, claiming she her partner was killed, and she was permanently injured in the same scenario.,
Nickles adds: "as ' smart key'-technology is a convenience function and, in General, new technology that allows to create an operator to remove the key ring from the vehicle while the vehicle is running, it certain vulnerabilities that do not exist with traditional key technology, including the risk of carbon monoxide gas from the vehicle while the driver spent wirdzusammen with the keys no longer in the vehicle are."
She says Toyota ignores these "foreseeable risks" and not "one install automatic shutdown or shutdown switch sheets in the case of a consumer inadvertently the vehicle with the key chain on their person executed."
You are seeking damages for wrongful death, negligence and product liability. It is of personal injury lawyer represented Robert Kelley with Kelley Uustal.
View the original article by courthouse news service, please click here.
Prevent Smart cars Georgia serious car accidents?
Intel Corporation has a goal of developing a really intelligent vehicle. A "smart" car if you like, collect its name for the data that it can collect not only the great fuel mileage is it. Their vision is that one day there is a car that meets their own decisions.
They are technology, such as that put them in the aircraft currently in the development of a car with "Black Box". This little black box is located in the car records data on vehicle speed, steering and brakes. There are also cameras inside of the car, which will be recorded in the Interior of the vehicle and outside is going. When the car in an accident was involved, would sent the video footage from the cameras and the information from the black box automatically to the police and the insurance company get.
The idea behind this is that it would help in determining which is the fault in a car accident. The long-term vision that they have is a car with camera systems is that actually identify street signs and traffic lights. If the driver wanted to do something illegal, such as drive through a red light, would be to take the car in the location and the driver to stop. This would be through the creation of a network where all the cars are permanently connected to the Internet and also connected to all other cars on the road reached.
A group of automakers, including Ford and Toyota, develop technology which allows to communicate with each other's cars and warn drivers. This system, IntelliDrive called all the time, busy GPS transmitter and Wi-Fi, transmit signals with position and velocity of the car. If a driver approaching a junction and is another car running a red light, system would warn the driver of the car brake beat, to avoid the collision. This system is definitely a bit less invasive than cameras in the car or have your car drive for you.
The question remains whether this type of technology really would make safe driving. Cars, in contrast to the people, will keep getting smarter and learn from their mistakes. You are not of cell phone calls, drive drunk or speed away to get. Smart cars can be never perfect, but they must not perfectly to reduce car accidents Georgia. Smart cars must only better than the driver are out there now, go out to kill errors and every year a million of their fellow citizens.
Until the day arrives when control cars themselves are and communicate with each other, are people still in the driver's seat. While remain in the control, will cause human error still serious Georgia car accidents on a daily basis.
If you or a loved one who has seriously injured or killed in a car accident Georgia a member of the family has you should the Georgia car accident lawyers Montlick and Associates contact. Car accident lawyers are our experienced Georgia for customers in all Georgia and in the Southeast, including but not limited to Albany, Athens, Atlanta, Augusta, Columbus, Gainesville, Macon, Marietta, Rome, Roswell, Savannah, Smyrna, Valdosta, helping Warner Robins and all the smaller towns and rural areas in the State. No matter where you are our lawyers are only a phone call away, and we come to you. Call the week us 24 hours a day/7 days for your free consultation at 1-800-LAW-NEED (1-800-529-6333). You can also visit us at www.montlick.com and use our free case evaluation form or 24-hour live online chat.
Avvo emphasizes ethical legal services smart Conference,
Posted on Monday, May 23rd, 2011If you know about Avvo, you know that there is a website reviews for lawyers, which rewarded experienced and ethical lawyers to consider a high ranking for the consumer to find smart, after legal advice. If you are unfamiliar with Avvo, because of the influential Web start is required, have significant effects on lawyers online, interaction will be an even more integral part of daily life as the Internet. Last week I had the opportunity, Avvo of the Avvocating Conference in Orlando, visit with information sessions on the best practices of Web marketing, the importance of Google local search, and the ethical questions that lawyers online was packed.
One of the lessons which I removed is that really the time to develop their online strategy, the world of online marketing should take lawyers before the jump. Setting up a blog, Facebook profile, and Twitter account, for example, be effective only if your company really has the time, these accounts to monitor and develop new, relevant content. Lawyers should also not forget, that vehicle to be a way, connect with people and discussions, no marketing social media. You develop a far more loyal and social after bookings and are interested in commenting on interesting stories (not just your own), and that engage in conversations with others.
Of course, this investment in social media and online marketing takes time and resources. Avvo stressed that if you choose the jump, it never should disturb your attention to the outstanding legal services to your customers. This is likely why it Brian fir tree invited (who not quite a fan of Avvo), speak on Friday morning. Schwschwschweden stressed that no amount of online marketing, simply a great lawyer can power of being meet. On this point he is completely right, which is why lawyers who intend online really should take the time to develop a strategy, contains the honest commitment.
Thanks to the entire Avvo crew for a great Conference. I will be looking forward to next year! A few more shout outs to moderators Vanessa Fox, who wrote the book marketing in the age of Google and Mike Blumenthal, one of the world's experts, when it comes to Google provide information.
