Texting While Driving Doubles Driver’s Reaction Time
AppId is over the quota
Posted On: October 5, 2011 by Mark A. Anderson
As a Dallas-Fort Worth auto wreck personal injury lawyer, I have long campaigned North Texas motorists to switch off their cellphone before getting behind the wheel of their car, truck or motorcycle. Distracted driving is a potentially fatal hazard. If you’re not paying attention to the road ahead – to driving safely – then you are risking your own life, the life of your passengers and anyone else who is unfortunate enough to be on the road near you at that time.
Think about how long it takes you to look down and read or send a text message. Now think about what potential danger you might miss or fail to notice in time: the 18 wheeler ahead of you breaking, for example; or a child running across the street. If you’re not paying attention, the results can be devastating. I know because I’ve helped the personal victims of people injured in such accidents, and the relatives of those who’ve lost someone to a distracted driving wrongful death collision too.
A new study by the Texas Transport Institute (TTI) has found that distracted driving is even more dangerous than previously thought. In fact, a distracted driver’s response time is double the reaction time of a focused, concentrated driver; taking up to five seconds longer. To put this in context, at 30 mph a vehicle will travel 220 feet in five seconds. At 60 mph, it will travel 440 feet. That means a huge risk for a major crash.
In 2009, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported that 5,500 people were killed in wrecks attributed to a distracted driver. A further half a million were injured. Remember too, that a large proportion of distracted driving victims are actually the distracted drivers themselves.
If you or a loved one has been hurt in accident caused by a distracted driver, it’s important that you consult with an experienced trial attorney to make sure you are fully aware of your legal responsibilities and your right to compensation to cover any medical expenses or other costs which you have incurred following your run-in with the negligent driver. For a free, no obligation consultation, please call me toll free at 800-354-MARK (6275) or call locally at 817-294-1900.
Michigan ban on TEXTING while driving | Car accidents | Michigan car accident lawyer
-Michael j. Smith, Waterford, MII chose Larry Buckfire as my medical malpractice lawyer for a wrongful death lawsuit against the VA Hospital in connection with the death of my father. He settled the case before filing a complaint. I will give it the top rating for a medical malpractice attorney of Michigan. He's the best!
-Sharon A., Ann Arbor, MIIf you need a personal injury lawyer in Michigan, I recommend Buckfire & Buckfire P.C. You won a Saginaw nursing home neglect settlement for my father, after the case rejected two other law firms.
-Jeffrey R., Detroit, MIWhen, I was in a Lansing-bicycle accident injured, I chose the company, in my no-fault insurance lawsuit represented me and mean to claim uninsured motorists. They made the insurance company to pay the whole directive and all of my services. If you are looking for the best car accident lawyers in Michigan, call them now!
-Robert M., Lansing, MII malpractice lawyer contacted the firm after researching on the Internet for Michigan. My mother died during surgery at a hospital in Lansing. Larry Buckfire proved that an anaesthesia error was the cause of her death. He won the major settlement in our unlawful death process and we are grateful for his hard work.
-Sherrie H., Chicago, ILAfter are suffering serious injuries in a car accident in Ann Arbor, I wanted the top Michigan auto accident attorney to my case handle. I chose Daniel Buckfire. Each time, when I was with other lawyers in Michigan, someone would say, we were as happy that "best". So thanks again!
-Pat V., Cleveland, OHmore
Texas Governor Rick Perry veto ban texting driving
Despite numerous protests and evidence, the legislator in Austin, which drive distracted is an incredibly dangerous epidemic that is rapidly growing out of control, Governor Rick Perry veto of House Bill 242, which would have made illegal SMS while driving in Texas. In its official said Perry, "texting while driving reckless and irresponsible." "I support measures to make safer, our roads for all but House Bill 242 is a Government effort to micromanage the behavior of adults."
Perry claimed that HB 242 would have a descent of the Government, but it confused me, as he came to this conclusion. How does a law to protect the welfare of the public equal tyranny of the State? If Governor Perry against legislation like HB 242, that is us "Micromanage", laws, laws then must he also against DWI and driving without insurance laws be. We should not laws to to tell us not to drink and we have to do but drive or text and drive.
It seems to me that Governor Perry in conjunction with the State of Texas. There was little opposition to this Bill in its necessary Committee hearings; Indeed Telecommunications giant support banning SMS such as AT & T, actually during the journey. Not only this law have democratic and Republican support, but the majority of respondents in a survey by Texas Transportation Institute last year Texas drivers prefer a ban on cell phone while driving.
Politics aside, SMS laws not you charge if you SMS and drive are and if they can save a life, they are the value of it. If I was rating on its decision, this much-needed anti-SMS and driving Bill veto Rick Perry, we'd him an F.
One of the largest jury verdicts in a TEXTING while driving case
A Robertson County, Texas jury has ordered to that a student almost 22 million dollars damages in a suit for wrongful death figures. The jury came to the conclusion that Jason Reed Vestal texting and driving, which resulted in a serious car accident in November 2007. This judgment is one of the largest in the history in case texting while driving.
Depending on the phone records Vestal sent and received 15 text messages, and seven phone calls of 45 minutes, which he rode before the fatal collision took place. The accident claimed the lives of the 21-year-old Megan small Houston, was a senior at Baylor University. Vestal of the truck collided head-on with small vehicle.
Vestal, said that he remember not everything from the accident and it's really hard to check whether it really caused his SMS. He said that his phone records to only prove that there were text messages and phone calls, while he was driving.
Hunter craft, the lawyer representing family called this principle in the case. "No. 1 is the first time a Texas jury spoken according to their thoughts on SMS and drive and has spoken." It was also the largest wrongful judgement ever to come from Robertson County death. "I think this is probably a synonym for the egregious nature of Reed Vestal code of conduct in the case," said craft.
The family would like to use advertising about the case to push Texas to make illegal legislators SMS while driving in the State.
One comment to "one of the largest jury verdicts in a TEXTING while driving case"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
The Virginia texting ban is really do their job?
Are crashes up?
According to a press release from the HLDI titled «Texting bans don't reduce crashes;» Effects are increased light crash "have some States which have adopted bans actually seen an increase in the crashes." "It is an indication that even the risk of SMS for drivers could increase bans texting, continue to do despite the laws," said Adrian Lund, President of the HLDI and Insurance Institute for highway safety.
It is believed that drivers with SMS are still after the ban, try to hide their mobile phones. "This could exacerbate the risk of SMS by driver further eyes from the road and for a long period," said Lund.
Pack away the mobile phone
There is no question that SMS and take is dangerous and irresponsible. Whenever you're behind the wheel, set your phone away. This will help that temptation, a "quick" text message send or read messages sent to you to eliminate. If you are the parent of a teen driver, encourage him or her to do the same. Through these measures, you can reduce the Virginia car accidents.
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
Rick Perry veto texting while driving Bill
As we all know, Governor Rick Perry is growing increasingly with average Texan wishes and needs. Another example of this is his veto of House Bill 242 which would prohibit SMS while driving. This is despite numerous protests and evidence, legislators in Austin, which is an incredibly dangerous epidemic which increases control quickly distracted.
In its official veto Governor Perry says that, while "texting while driving reckless and irresponsible is" he believes the proposed law it is a step too far, since as "Government effort to micromanage the behavior of the adults." is to see well Yes, the point of the law it's not? Driving while intoxicated is illegal. Drunk drivers may be a danger for all in the privacy of their personal cars, but while they are on public roads. I think that should drive distracted similarly viewed.
The irony of the Perry's statement is that rather that each TEXTING while driving, those who recognize that the practice is dangerous instead should focus on educating the public, legislative lobbying. I think the public is generally aware how dangerous use the mobile phone can be while behind the wheel. In fact it has sent by rejecting law, Perry a glaring signal, that undermines these efforts.
What do you think? Let me know on my Facebook page or on Twitter.
Rick Perry veto texting while driving Bill
As we all know, Governor Rick Perry is growing increasingly with average Texan wishes and needs. Another example of this is his veto of House Bill 242 that would ban texting while driving. This is despite the numerous protests and evidence, the legislator in Austin, that drive an incredibly dangerous epidemic which increases control quickly is distracted.
In its official veto Governor Perry says that, while "texting while driving reckless and irresponsible is" he believes the proposed law a step is too far, as it as "Government effort to micromanage the behavior of the adult." could be seen is now, Yes, that the law is not? Driving while intoxicated is illegal. Drunk drivers may be a threat to all in the privacy of their personal cars, but while they are on public roads. I think that should drive distracted similarly viewed.
The irony of the Perry's statement is, that rather that each TEXTING while driving, those who recognize that the practice is dangerous instead focus should be on educating the public instead of lobbying legislators. I think the public is generally aware how dangerous with the mobile phone can be while behind the wheel. In fact it has sent by rejecting law, Perry a glaring signal, which undermines all of these efforts.
What do you think? Let me know on my Facebook page or on Twitter.
Bold proposition, texting while driving laws to increase
With 33 States now texting bills have passed while driving, it is clear that the seriousness of this problem with mainstream award is started. Despite this, most people ignore these laws, despite knowing they are there. Seattle personal injury attorney Jason Epstein has marked an answer to this problem: punish the prisoners texting and we take those punish just caught driving under the influence. Appear as a radical solution? As explained in the following article Jason, not only this is not radical, but it is an absolute necessity in the light of the statistics involved. Read the article below and let you know whether you agree with his view Jason!
Seattle lawyer proposes sweeping changes to TEXTING while driving laws
Tags: cell phone texting while driving law penalties, texting and driving penalties, texting while driving laws, Washington, texting while driving laws to increase
Tweet
One of the largest jury verdicts in a TEXTING while driving case
A Robertson County, Texas jury has ordered to that a student almost 22 million dollars damages in a suit wrongful death figures. The jury came to the conclusion that Jason Reed Vestal texting and driving, which resulted in a serious car accident in November 2007. This judgment is one of the largest in the history in case texting while driving.
Depending on the phone of records Vestal sent and received 15 text messages and seven calls during the 45 minutes, which, he went before the fatal collision took place. The car accident claims, the life of the 21-year-old Megan small Houston, was the senior at Baylor University. Vestal's truck collided head-on with small vehicle.
Vestal, said that he remember anything from the accident not and it's really hard to check whether it really caused his texting. He said that his phone records only prove, that there were text messages and phone calls, while he was driving.
Hunter craft, which is the nuclear family, lawyer, called it a landmark case. "No. 1 is the first time a Texas jury spoken according to their thoughts on texting and driving and has pronounced." It was also the largest wrongful death judgment ever to come out of Robertson County. I think, this is probably a synonym for the egregious nature of Reed Vestal code of conduct in the case of "Craft said."
The family would like to use advertising about the case while driving illegal in the State to urge Texas legislature to SMS.
One comment to "one of the largest jury verdicts in a TEXTING while driving case"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]
The Virginia texting ban is really do their job?
Are crashes up?
According to a press release from the HLDI entitled «Texting bans don't reduce crashes;» Effects are increased light crash, "actually some States which have adopted bans have seen an increase in the crashes." "It is an indication that even texting for driver could increase bans texting that continue to do despite the laws," said Adrian Lund, President of the HLDI and Insurance Institute for highway safety.
It will hide that drivers, even after the ban are the texting, try suspected, their mobile phones as you type. "This increase the risk of texting could by the drivers eyes from the road and for a long time," said Lund.
Pack away the mobile phone
There is no question, that texting and driving is dangerous and irresponsible. Whenever you're behind the wheel, you put away your cell phone. That will help, "quick" eliminate text message, the temptation to send or read messages sent to you. If you are the parent of a teen driver, encourage him or her to do the same. These take action you can reduce the number of the Virginia car accidents.
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]
Northgate Mall shows car from texting while driving accident
Distracted as a Lynnwood personal injury lawyer I know, that, when most people hear the term drive they can texting or talking on a cell phone think. But there are many other things, the driver, distracting if they are on the road, things like put on make-up or eat lunch. Some men have to work even on their drive in the morning shave known. My Seattle car accident law firm helps the victims of distracted driving to a serious personal injury or even wrongful death in the hands of a driver distracted return to life.
23 February 2010 was three miles from home Tumwater Heather LERCH, when she started texting a friend and not paying attention take to the street, in a railing fell, die immediately. Today their parents for the remains have their car allowed on Northgate Mall people of the dangers of distracted driving to be remember to see. Along with the ruins of the Seattle will be a thing Police Department page, talk about the new text to speak ticket law. The law allows to use the driver on handheld devices, to the mobile phone while driving, but teens speak with intermediate driver license or learner permits use wireless device while driving, including hands. Violators will receive a $124-ticket, if they keep police a phone to the ear or SMS while driving to see.
A recent study has shown that drivers are talking on their mobile phone in the car only as impaired as a drunk driver with a BAC of. 08%. Teens against distracted driving is a program that I began to young people about the dangers of distracted driving to educate. I have given taken reminding commitments and bracelets teens across the nation not to text and drive. Regardless age we must think of everyone, to use our phones, not while we are in the car. Click here to take my promise and get a free bracelet to help your promise not to text and drive not forget.
Tags: Distracted driving, Heather LERCH, Lynnwood personal injury lawyer, Northgate Mall, assault, Seattle car accident law firm, Seattle Police Department, teens against distracted driving, text talk ticket, texting while driving, wrongful death
Tweet
