Marriot Withdraws "blame the victime" defense in rape case

Marriot Withdraws "blame the victime" defense in rape case

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Kudos to the Marriott International corporation who firmly rejected a defense to a lawsuit which one of its defense attorney teams had asserted.

A Connecticut woman who was allegedly raped at gunpoint in front of her children in a hotel parking garage. The assailant went to jail.

Whether or not you believe that Marriott had any responsibility to prevent a criminal act (we don't know all the facts) the wizards on the defense team inserted typical boilerplate language in the defense of the case that asserted that this mom was herself resonsible for the criminal act because she "failed to exercise due care for her own safety."

As you can imagine, this boilerplate defense, inserted by lawyers paid by an insurance company, was NOT a good thing for Marriot's public relations. After all, why would you go to a hotel that thought so little of its customers?

Good of Marriott to say to its own defense team, in effect, you guys are morons.

Whether its a company that tells its customers that they need to go to another state to sue them or a health facility that says to the disabled, you aren't allowed to sue us...corporations must know that the defenses they assert in lawsuits have meaning beyond the current case.

As we see them, we will continue to expose them, as we expose those cases we deem frivolous.

Message:

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.

For security purposes, please enter the graphic text in the box below: [hit F5 if you can not read the text]


View the original article here

Marriot payouts "blame the victime" defence in rape case

Marriot payouts "blame the victime" defence in rape case

Kudos for the Marriott International Corporation, the defense of litigation firmly rejected, lawyer teams that had made one of their defense.

A woman, Connecticut, who was allegedly raped at gunpoint to their children in a hotel car park. The attacker went to jail.

Regardless of whether you believe that Marriott had no responsibility, inserted into the wizard's defense team typical vorformulierten a crime to prevent (we know not all of the facts) language in the defense of the case, which claimed that this mother it was for the crime because they "error for the due exercise of care for their own safety."

As you can imagine, defense, was this boilerplate inserted by lawyers, which insurance no good thing for the public relations Marriot paid. Eventually would go why to the hotel, so little thought of the customers?

Defence say well from Marriott with his own team, in fact you guys are idiots.

Whether its a company that says its customers that they need to go to another State to sue, they, or a healthcare facility that says with a disability, you are not allowed to sue us... Companies need to know that they claim the defense in litigation have meaning beyond the current case.

As they see, we will continue to expose how we expose these cases, which we consider irresponsible.

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]


View the original article here

Marriot payouts "blame the victime" defence in rape case

Marriot payouts "blame the victime" defence in rape case

Kudos for the Marriott International Corporation, the defense of litigation firmly rejected, which made one of their defense lawyer claims team.

A woman, Connecticut, who was allegedly raped at gunpoint to their children in a hotel car park. The perpetrators went to prison.

Regardless of whether you believe that Marriott had no responsibility to prevent a criminal offence (we know not all facts) inserted into the wizard on the defense team typical boilerplate language in the defense of the case, which claims that this MOM it was for the crime because they "failed due to exercise care for their own safety."

As you can imagine, it was boilerplate defense, inserted by lawyers insurance paid no good thing for Marriot's public relations. Finally would go why to the hotel, so little thought of the customers?

Best of Marriott to defence say with his own team, in fact, you guys are idiots.

Whether its a company that says its customers that they need to go to another State to sue, they, or a healthcare facility that says with a disability, you are not allowed to sue us... Companies must know that they claim the defense in litigation have meaning beyond the current case.

As they see, we will continue to expose how we expose these cases, which we consider irresponsible.

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]


View the original article here