Walgreens looses wrong prescription case
AppId is over the quota
BARTOW, Fla. – A jury awarded $25.8 million Friday to the family of a cancer patient who was given a wrong prescription, had a stroke and died several years later, lawyers said. Beth Hippely was prescribed Warfarin, a blood thinner, in 2002 to treat breast cancer. The prescription filled at a Walgreens pharmacy was 10 times what her doctor prescribed, court documents said.
The Polk County Circuit Court jury found the prescription error caused a cerebral hemorrhage resulting in permanent bodily injury, disability and physical pain. The mother of three died in January at the age of 46.
A 19-year-old pharmacy technician, with little training, misfiled the prescription, according to court documents.
The lawsuit was filed in 2003 by Hippely, her husband Deane Hippely and their children against the Deerfield, Ill.-based Walgreen Co. for negligent breach of duty and wrongful death.
“Beth Hippely died unnecessarily because this tenfold overdose with Warfarin by the pharmacy she trusted caused her cancer to come back with a vengeance and it interrupted all of her cancer treatments,” her lawyer Chris Searcy said. “They have been seeking justice for almost five years and this was a case that screamed out for justice.”
A statement released by the company expressed sympathy for the Hippely family.
“We’re truly sorry for what the Hippely family has been through, and we’ve personally apologized to them,” Walgreens spokeswoman Carol Hively said in a statement. “We have been, and continue to be, the leader in pharmacy safety initiatives. We had hoped the verdict would have been fair and reasonable.”
Hively said the company had not decided if it would appeal the decision.
A Psychiatric Disability Case Gone Wrong For AT&T
AppId is over the quota
Here's a great case out of Tennessee in which the insurance doctor made a decision to deny with hardly any information. That's dangerous because what if they then miss information that makes it an obviously valid claim? Well then they get sued and taken to court and that's exactly what happened.
It was a psychiatric disability case and those are tricky and require a bit more attention from the disability insurer. Dr. Grimes, the reviewing psychiatrist made the decision to deny based on the opinion that the claimant was able to perform her job. She made that decision without any knowledge of the claimant's job, without interviewing the claimant, and without consulting with all of the claimant's treating mental health professionals.
That might fly in physical disability cases because often the records can speak for themselves, but when they're dealing with psychiatric disability it's important to have a physician actually meet with the claimant to determine the extent of the disability. Unfortunately that's not how the insurance companies want to do it, so they don't. Trying to save a little time and money and they're asking for litigation. Well, again, they got it. Next time they should take the time to actually review the claim and save everyone the hassle of court by accepting the initial claim.
Click here to read the full opinion of Allen v. AT&T Disability Income Program, the case in question.
Message:
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
For security purposes, please enter the graphic text in the box below: [hit F5 if you can not read the text]
Court was Wrong to Dismiss Case-Now the Parties Wait Longer for Justice
AppId is over the quota
Posted on Mar 04, 2008
A typical tactic used by Virginia medical malpractice insurance companies to defend claims ateries are mistakenly clamped or sutured or cut in surgery is to say "well, the anatomy was abnormal," and that's why it happened.
The Virgnia Supreme Court recently held that a trial court was wrong in dismissing a case where there was conflicting evidence that there was abnormal anatomy.
Clifford Lewis Fanucci, Sr., died after undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for a cancerous growth on his kidney. Daniel Mark Hoffman, M.D. clamped the right renal artery instead of the left renal artery during surgery. When he discovered his error, he unclamped the artery but it tore, killing his patient.
There was conflicting evidence at trial about whether Fanucci's anatomy was unusual. Doctors who came in to repair the torn right renal artery that they found nothing abnormal. The pathologist who did the autopsy said he found nothing unusual about the position of the right renal artery, either.
The only doctors to testify that there was anything 'unusual' about the right renal artery were the defendant and his partner!
The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the trial court and ordered a new trial.
Comment from Virginia Medical Malpractice Attorney Ben Glass: the actions of the trial judge are frightening and demonstrate just how difficult a jurisdiction Virginia is for medical malpractice cases. As I read the opinion, there was basically guess-work on the part of the defendant and his partner as to how or why he managed to clamp the wrong artery. There was no real 'evidence' on this issue. In fact, the only real 'evidence' from two indepedent doctors who actually saw the right renal artery was that the anatomy was normal. To me this case is not even close and there is no way the judge should have stopped the jury from making the decision.
This was enourmously expensive for both parties. Even if the judge felt the case should not have been decided by the jury he should have allowed them to decide it later. Then, he could have reversed the jury's decision, but at least the Supreme Court could have reinstated the jury's verdict.
The judge was wrong.. now the parties wait at least another year, spend another $$75,000 or so to retry the case.
Payee notification in Virginia-some lawyers against it and they are wrong
There is payment recipients in Virginia a simple solution and its notification.
Amazing, against some lawyers in Virginia of this consumer protection statute.
They need it to questions, why.
I invite to "have it" on this blog and express their opinions as why Virginia payee notifications now not should adopt.
One comment to "payee notification in Virginia-some lawyers against it and they are wrong"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
Wrong way driver down - 30 after the collision with an 18 Wheeler
How often does drunk drivers accidents in Texas? A Mansfield woman with a history of alcohol-related arrests, this morning the wrong way drove Interstate 30 to the East and crashed into an 18-Wheeler drag fuel your car down. After the truck car was hit by drunk driver, it jack knifed and about 100 litres fuel spills. Fortunately, the truck driver was ok, but as for the Mansfield woman, she is in very critical condition at Baylor Medical Center.
Messy, this was an accident. Emergency teams had in the woman's car, to free her cut and the motorway had to remain devastation closed just before the morning rush hour for several hours. If you had to drive today morning on I-30, I am sure that this accident your commute affected. All due to the idiot decisions by one person.
A bad name by many drivers, but it the 18 Wheeler is get truck driver not always them to cause accidents in Texas. As a result are their broadcast schedules these hard-working people out there go all hours of the night. Unfortunately, this is when much intoxicated to drive driver. Although the investigation underway and police have not officially said, if this young woman was intoxicated, feel I almost sure that it was me. I mean come on, how you do not know that you go to the wrong side of the, if you are drunk?
Police said this woman has a history of alcohol related arrests - it is only 25! How many times it takes the point to you! It is crazy me, that the State of Texas can have an impact on this problem. I try to do what I can keep responsible as a drunk driving accident Attorney Fort Worth, these criminals for their actions. I really hope that this young lady makes a full recovery; It is only 25 and has the rest of their lives to get it together. Maybe this time they can finally learn their actions and put the bottle.
Are you a step in the wrong direction of Sunday alcohol sales?
Georgien ist einer von nur drei Staaten im ganzen Land, ein Verbot der Verkauf von Alkohol an Läden Sonntags haben gewesen. Letzten Monat geändert, wenn das Parlament Senat Bill 10 genehmigt. Die Gesetzgebung würde lokale Städte, die Frage setzen aus, an den Wahlen teilzunehmen ermöglichen. Bis zum nächsten Jahr könnte Sonntag Verkauf von Alkohol in u-Bahn-Atlanta Realität und anderen Gebietsschemas werden.
Die meisten der Unterstützung für die Rechnung kamen aus Geschäften, die Alkohol-Industrie, der Georgien-Handelskammer und andere Business-Gruppen. Die Rechnung wurden gegen und ins Stocken geraten in den Rechtsvorschriften von republikanischen Führer für den letzten vier Jahren. Viele konservative gegen das Gesetz besagt, dass es zu einem Anstieg der alkoholbedingten Verkehrstoten führen würde. Einige der Ansicht, dass auch wenn bestimmte Grafschaften und Städte nicht genehmigen Sonntag der Verkauf von Alkohol, die sie noch vom rund um diejenigen, die Tat betroffen sein.
DUI in Georgien
Fahren unter Alkoholeinfluss ist bereits ein ernstes Problem in Georgien laut der National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Von 1994 bis 2008 406.5 alkoholbedingten Todesfälle pro Jahr aufgetreten ist, und dies dargestellt im Durchschnitt 25,8 % der alle Fahrbahn Todesfälle pro Jahr.
In Georgien gilt als eine Person durch Alkohol beeinträchtigt, wenn sie eine Blutalkoholgehalt (BAC) von 08 oder höher haben. Wenn ein Treiber ein Kraftfahrzeug mit einem BAC auf dieser Ebene oder höher ausgeführt wird, werden sie mit zwei gesetzliche Vergehen berechnet. Sie werden mit DUI oder fahren unter dem Einfluss und die "per se" Vergehen, die mit einem BAC 0,08 % fahren ist aufgeladen oder höher. Erste und zweite Vergehen sind andere Kleinigkeiten während 3rd und nachfolgende Vergehen sind hoch und Vergehen verschärft.
Todesopfer und Alkohol
Viele unschuldige Leben sind durch alkoholbedingte Unfälle in Georgien Grafschaften auf einer wöchentlichen Basis gekostet. Nur die letzten Montagabend, der letzten College-Absolvent namens Liam Rattray wurde getötet, nachdem auf seinem Motorrad von einem betrunkenen Autofahrer getroffen wird. Der junge Mann hatte nur graduierte Summa Cum Laude von Georgia Tech und war ein amerikanischer Staatsbürger geworden, nur drei Monate vor. Er fuhr sein Motorrad in städtischen Atlanta, wenn er von hinten von Darrin Murphy, eine 42-jährige, die fuhr getroffen wurde, während berauscht. Der Mann ist mit ersten Grad Totschlag, nach zu eng und DUI einbehalten.
In diesem Monat wurde 57 Jahre alter Georgien Richter auch angeklagt überhöhte Geschwindigkeit, offene Container und fahren unter dem Einfluss. In noch einem anderen Fall wurde ein 33 Einjahres-Pilot erst letzte Woche verhaftet, als er in einer zwei-Fahrzeug-Kollision an einer Kreuzung von Georgiens Fahrbahnen verwickelt war. Die 58 Jahre alte Frau in dem anderen Auto starb in der Szene. Der Pilot ist mit ersten Grades vehicular Homicide, DUI und Fehler, ein Verkehrs-Steuersignal gehorchen einbehalten.
Alkoholbedingte Unfälle kennen keine Altersgrenzen und Jugendliche sind Opfer viel Zeit. Bereits im Februar im Douglas County waren eine Gruppe von Jugendlichen in ein SUV fahren bei einem Unfall beteiligt, wenn der Fahrer die Kontrolle über das Fahrzeug verloren. Der Treiber getrunken hatte, und ein Junge war aus dem SUV ausgelöst und getötet, während zwei weitere wurden verletzt, bei dem Absturz. Der junge ist mit vehicular Homicide und DUI einbehalten.
Die Verwüstungen, die fahren unter Alkoholeinfluss in das Leben der Menschen herbeiführen können, ist enorm. Während einige, dass es ungefährlich ist denken vielleicht, kann die Entscheidung, der Verkauf von Alkohol for one more Day am Wochenende zuzulassen, die Anzahl der betrunkene Autofahrer erhöhen. Ein Anstieg der Trunkenheit ist keine gute Sache, da sie oft den Verlust unschuldigen Lebens führt.
Wenn Sie oder jemand, den Sie lieben ernsthaft verletzt oder wurde von einem betrunkenen Autofahrer getötet, können Montlick and Associates, Rechtsanwälte, Sie versuchen, der Gerechtigkeit und der Entschädigungen, die Sie verdienen, wie wir für diejenigen in ganz Georgien seit mehr als 27 Jahren getan haben. Unserer Georgien betrunken treibende Unfall Rechtsanwälte stehen den Kunden in ganz Georgien, einschließlich aber nicht beschränkt auf Albany, Athen, Atlanta, Augusta, Columbus, Dalton, Gainesville, Macon, Marietta, Rom, Roswell, Savannah, Smyrna, Valdosta, Warner Robins und alle kleineren Städten und ländlichen Gebieten in den Zustand zu helfen. Rufen Sie uns heute für Ihre kostenlose Beratung bei 1-800-LAW-NEED (1-800-529-6333), oder besuchen Sie uns im Internet unter www.montlick.com. Egal wo Sie in Georgien sind wir sind nur einen Telefonanruf entfernt, und wir kommen sogar zu Ihnen.
Doctor works with wrong side and his insurance company says "we is not nothing wrong doing!"
Was denken eine Medizinische Verfehlung Sie, die Versicherungsgesellschaft sagen würde, wenn ein Arzt
1. ruft "verloren" und betreibt auf der falschen Seite der Schulter
2. entfernt Gewebe, die nicht brauchen, um entfernt werden, während das Orginal-Problem in Ort, (um durch eine andere Chirurgen, später fixiert)
(3) Bewirkt, dass unnötige Narben und zusätzliche medizinische Versorgung
4. Gesteht der Patient machte er einen großen Fehler und er ist Leid
Macht der Patient dann einen sehr vernünftigen Siedlung-Vorschlag in dem Bemühen, das System nicht "verstopfen" mit einem anderen Fall?
Die Versicherungsgesellschaft, bekannt für seine "Position" des Nehmens von jedem Fall vor Gericht, sagte
"unser Arzt nicht nichts Unrechtes macht." (fast wie hat es einen Serienbrief für alle Fälle!)
O.k., come here we.
Weitere Informationen auf wie ein Virginia medizinische Kunstfehler Versicherungsgesellschaft sagte "bezahlt wird nicht" ist hier auf eine falsche einseitig Chirurgie-Fall.
Ein Kommentar zu "Doctor betreibt auf falschen Seite und seine Versicherungsgesellschaft sagt"wir nicht nichts Unrechtes macht!""
Nachricht:
Benachrichtigen Sie mich über Follow-up-Kommentare per e-Mail.
Aus Sicherheitsgründen geben Sie den Grafik-Text in das Feld unten: [drücken Sie F5, wenn Sie den Text nicht lesen können]
Psychiatric disability case wrong for AT & T
It was a psychiatric disability case and those are difficult and requires a little more attention from the disability insurer. The decision, refuse Dr. Grimes, who met psychiatrist review based on the view that the applicant could perform their jobs. She made this decision without any knowledge of the plaintiff job without interviewing the claimant and without consultation with all the applicant's treatment of mental health professionals.
That may be in physical disability fly cases, because often the records for that can speak, but when they do to with psychiatric disabilities have it is important to a doctor who have actually to take the applicant to determine the extent of the disability. Unfortunately, is not how the insurance companies want to do it, so that they are not. Try to save a little time and money and ask for legal disputes. Now, again, they got it. The next time they take the time, actually the claim check and save the effort all the Court through the adoption of the first groups of stakeholders.
Click here for the full opinion of Allen v. AT & T disability income program to read the case.
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
Fredericksbur paper reports on surgery, operated on the wrong side
Could the pathologist of the breast cancer diagnosis was wrong
It is not breaking news.
In 2006 Susan G. Komen for the cure, a survivor of breast cancer organization, published a study with alarming results. According to the New York Times, these researchers reports that in 90 000 cases, women who were diagnosed with DCIS or invasive breast cancer "not the disease or its pathologist have either an other error that resulted in incorrect treatment."
This 2006 study was, not in isolation. In the year 2002 doctors at Northwestern University Medical Center saw the pathology of 340 patients with breast cancer and discovered that in addition to 8 percent of cases had errors. These errors were significant enough to change the plans for surgery.
The New York Times pathologist also reported a San Francisco, 597 breast cancer cases from 2007 and 2008 checks found discrepancies in 141 of them.
Were you diagnosed with breast cancer?
If you have been incorrectly diagnosed and have suffered as a result, you should talk medical malpractice lawyer with a Virginia. It is also important that you details of cases of misconduct by media research. Learn more by ordering a free copy of the book, why the most medical malpractice victims never recover a cent.
* Source: The New York Times, "prone to errors: earliest steps to look for cancer"
One comment to "The pathologist would wrongly have about the breast cancer diagnosis"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
How hospitals can prevent the wrong limb
No one wants to be the victim of medical malpractice. Unfortunately, these errors occur (at a rate that may surprise you). People can jokes about the idea of writing "Cutting not this stage" to itself with a marker before you, but it is this kind of provision which can avoid years of pain and suffering.
We are happy to announce, that Fairfax surgical center which has right and preparing a patient for surgery is marked before they went into the operating room. They took measures to avoid a false unilateral surgery.
It now is, how, that it should be done. Future patients Note: If you do not want to suffer to everyone extra because of an error in which flip, is odds of a unprepared surgeon must tell quite clearly there, where the knife should go, and should not go.
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
Fredericksburg, surgeon at the wrong site reprimanded operated
Joint Commission works to prevent wrong site surgery
Posted on Jul 21, 2010
The Joint Commission Board of Commissioners originally approved the universal protocol for wrong site prevent wrong procedure and wrong person SurgeryTM in July 2003, and it joined 1 July 2004 for all accredited hospitals, ambulatory care and Office-based surgery facilities. The universal protocol was created to the continuing occurrence of wrong site, wrong procedure and surgery in Joint Commission accredited organizations address wrong person. The universal Protocol to moved and expanded and integrated a number of requirements under the Joint Commission in 2003 and 2004 national patient safety goals. There are three main components of the universal Protocol: conducting a preprocedure verification process, marking the procedure site, and a timeout before the procedure to perform.
back to top
If after a Virginia ER a wrong turn takes a trip
If you with a medical emergency, which faced a journey that he will be asked, you can bar at the mercy of medical professionals. You have to carefully choose not the luxury of your doctor. Instead you must trust that the ER doctors and nurses for you a high degree of care are ready.
Emergency rooms are often understaffed and overcrowded, that's a bad combination. Serious medical errors can occur, causing great injury or death. Some common ER error include:
Failure of a disease misdiagnosis diagnose a medical ConditionPrescription error (wrong medicine or bad dosage) order the corresponding tests failedNot every bad outcome from an emergency room visit is one of the reasons for a medical malpractice lawsuit from Virginia. However, there are some situations where ER doctors and nurses avoidable error to make. If these emergency room errors lead to serious injuries, the medical provider could be held liable.
To learn more about medical malpractice, you order the book, why the most medical errors never recover a cent victims. This book is offered for free for Virginia residents.
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
Joint Commission works to prevent wrong site surgery
Posted on Jul 21, 2010
The Joint Commission Board of Commissioners originally approved the universal protocol for wrong site prevent wrong procedure and wrong person SurgeryTM in July 2003, and it joined 1 July 2004 for all accredited hospitals, ambulatory care and Office-based surgery facilities. The universal protocol was created to the continuing occurrence of wrong site, wrong procedure and surgery in Joint Commission accredited organizations address wrong person. The universal Protocol to moved and expanded and integrated a number of requirements under the Joint Commission in 2003 and 2004 national patient safety goals. There are three main components of the universal Protocol: conducting a preprocedure verification process, marking the procedure site, and a timeout before the procedure to perform.
back to top
Insurers wanted to not the responsibility of the patient wrong site surgery to take
What would have been a routine surgery, turned into a fiasco. The nurses in Surgery Center prepared the patient's back shoulder surgery. The problem started however after Mrs Fincher was under anesthesia. Dr. Snedden examines the two sides of the shoulder and the Lipoma is not found. After examination, he decided the MRI carried out previously, that the lump was the shoulder on the front, in spite of, that a radiologist had reported that the was Lipoma on back.
Dr. Snedden was tried on a research find the Lipoma. He split unnecessary muscles and tissues. In all, the investigation and decomposition of tissues and muscles, the Lipoma is not removed.
Mrs Fincher again Sneddens Office the next day. If was removed the dressing, you could see even the Lipoma. Dr. Snedden admitted to the mistake. The surgeon medical malpractice insurance company but claimed that the surgeon wrong nothing have, not the patient attempt, the event rules.
While this could be a smaller medical malpractice case, Mrs Fincher wants to make a point. You have to get up and responsibility to assume, if you make a mistake.
Here's my take - we have something and, that something is not for tort reform cry and refuse to valid claims.
One comment to "non insurers want the responsibility of patients wrong site surgery to take over"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
Lawyer sues wrong practice - VA Supreme Court upheld a complaint
Weatherbee's suit against Dr. Ward Vaughan was dismissed as "frivolous" and Weatherbee a public rebuke from VA state bar.
Not sure how "Bob" and "Ward" get mess but it is simply to show why you need to handle an experienced medical malpractice attorney in your case.
Here is the VA state bar notice of Michael Weatherbee. It explains in detail how he violated standard therapy for the treatment of medical malpractice cases.
Weatherbee appealed the complaint to the SCoVA, but she confirmed the allegation. Good for them.
One comment to "lawyer sues wrong practice - VA Supreme Court confirmed reference"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
MedMal cases wrong in Virginia's largest judgment
However, that $7.4 million is not what the plaintiff was awarded, simply what thought the jury the case was worth. Unfortunately the jury judgment medical malpractice Cap (i.e. found missing between 1 July 2001 and 1 July 2002) to the current Virginia of $1.6 million and is only 15 highest verdict in Virginia for 2009.
The story is the same for the other medical malpractice cases. In fact, if you in the caps each medical malpractice judgment applied to factor, just a case makes the top 10, a judgment $ 1.85 million, and it has rankte Darden as number combo 10., the million dollar-Medmal judgments from Virginia in 2009 total $ 11.72 million not just the largest 2009 ruling in the State, a 13.5 million US-dollar false advertising claim.
Food for thought is the next time the someone you that says medical malpractice reforms required. Unfortunately, it is already here and the plaintiff's their only recovery since 1999 refuse served has.
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
Text & tables before abuse & fraud charges goes wrong after breast augmentation
According to the recent opinion of Dr. Wray the patient told of the sponge but said that the complications were not related to the sponge. One of the nurses at the Lewis Gale clinic, Katherine Vaughan, this confirms the patient and told them that there no legal claim, because the sponge was not the cause of the problems.
Repeated surgery (on the clinic dollars) and again the implant had the same problems and has been removed. Finally, it has some other work to insert an Expander square make for a future implant and simplify the process of adoption. Right, before it was sent in the OR for the operation, the patient received a release and a check for the cost of the original surgery. This version was an agreement the defendants hold not be liable for the cost of surgery.
Now is the shady. I wonder if it happens much, or is this only an aberration. Let us hope that it is.
I have the latest on this medical malpractice and medical fraud case here.
One comment to "Docs facing misconduct & fraud charges goes wrong after breast enlargement"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
Patients tips to prevent wrong site surgery errors in Virginia
It may sound stupid, that tips even have this type of problem exist too, so, but yes, there are some general steps you can take to make sure that a wrong site surgery reality in your healthcare. Tips on how this would be not unfortunately necessary, if we not surgical team process, but wrong site surgery is still a reality in the world which is medical malpractice.
The first step is to discuss in detail with your doctor the procedure that you want to run and where should it take place. There is a big difference between a stone of the left kidney to remove and then on the right kidney, there is no stone in which active.
Another good tip, follow the marking of involveto the surgical. You know your body better than anyone else, and when a nurse tries to mark your right ankle when you know that it is your left, which has the fracture, you need to speak. Some hospitals have even the patient to mark the site with a permanent markers.
Ask more questions, or wrong. If things seem confusing If you always are not answers or don't like what you hear, you should questions for another opinion before any procedure is started. You have the right, in the safety and quality your healthcare actively be included.
Unfortunately, also patients who follow these tips guide the risk of a wrong site surgery and medical malpractice claim. If you are the unfortunate victims of wrong site surgery or any kind of surgical error, please contact a Fairfax medical malpractice lawyer immediately, work begin on your medical malpractice claim.
Medical malpractice lawyer contact a Fairfax
You do not have to deal with insurance companies and hospitals alone, if you look, to a Virginia medical malpractice case file. Fairfax medical malpractice lawyer Ben glass fights to help pay their medical malpractice claims victims in Virginia and DC.
Before you go no further with your decision, you order a copy of my free guide to the Virginia medical malpractice claims, why most medical malpractice victims never a cent. To set up a free consultation, please contact me 703 591 9829.today-
One comment to "Patients tips to prevent wrong site surgery errors in Virginia"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
