Auto Accident Lawyer

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Can 911-emergency text messaging services contribute to more danger and car accidents on the road? (Photo by ABC News)

The FCC just announced Monday that texting services will be added to the 911 emergency lineup. The government agency decided to add texting services as part of their emergency response system since 70 percent of 911 calls are derived from mobile devices. Now, individuals facing an emergency will be able to relay help to dispatchers using text services, according to ABC News. But how will texting 911 mix with texting and driving laws in California?

FCC chairman Julius Genachowski has committed to modernize FCC protocol, calling it the Next-Generation 911 service. “911 is an indispensable, live-saving tool,” Genachowski said. “But today’s 911 system doesn’t support the communication tools of tomorrow. Even though mobile phones are the device of choice for most 911 callers, and we primarily use our phones to text, right now, you can’t text 911.”

The pros of the Next-Generation 911 service will allow individuals to communicate with emergency service in situations where they are unable to speak. This will be useful in an emergency car accident if an individual is faced with some sort of technical difficulty: no signal, low battery, or poor service.

However, an overlooked con to texting emergency services is the possible distraction it can impose on those already driving, especially if they are in a perilous situation. Distracted driving laws in California including cell phone use and text messaging have been strict, and for good reason.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, dialing a cell phone increases the risk of a car accident or near car accident 2.8 times. And, text messaging increases the risk of a car accident or near car accident a staggering 23.2 times when compared to the car accident statistics with non-distracted driver.

Texting while driving has the potential to create a crash epidemic if texting continues to grow in popularity. If coupled with a true emergency, will texting 911 have any impact on maintaining safety on the road?

The jury is out: should the FCC modernize 911 calling with text services, or does this pose a further risk to causing car accidents on the road?

If you’ve been injured in a car accident arising out of suspected text messaging or cell phone use, contact our San Diego car accident attorneys today at 1-800-655-6585 for a free evaluation of your case.

View the original article here

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Posted on Friday, October 21st, 2011

Last spring, a “Healthy Kids Survey” was given to Piedmont and Millennium high school students. Shockingly, students self-reported that 48 percent of juniors had driven a car after they had been drinking or had been in a car driven by a friend who’d been drinking.

Hoping to reverse the trends revealed in that survey, the California Highway Patrol travels to schools like Piedmont’s to deliver powerful “Every 15 Minutes” presentations. The presentations involve a live staging of a deadly drunk driving crash, a memorial at the school the next day and a video presentation and panel discussion a couple weeks later. According to the program’s website, the goal is to emotionally connect drunk driving with negative consequences, to go past “the intellectual statistics” with which teens have been bombarded.

On October 3 of this year, real police and firefighters responded to the mock crash, which featured a drunk teenage driver and his two passengers and another teenager driver carrying one passenger. In the simulation, the drunk driver and one of his friends was unharmed, but the second passenger was killed when he flew through the windshield. The other car’s drivers are seriously injured but survive.

The next day, the entire school gathered for a mock memorial service intended to drive home the seriousness of the previous evening’s demonstration. The students were also informed that the drunk driver has been sentenced to 26 years in prison.

Importantly, the California Highway Patrol’s program doesn’t stop there, and capitalizes on the chance to bring students and parents together to talk about the realities of teen drinking and driving habits. The Piedmont panel was a lively exchange in which students told parents that they would feel more comfortable calling them for rides home if they felt they wouldn’t get in trouble. Parents said they felt uneasy about condoning drinking in their house or at any other time.

That reality puts parents in a tough position. They want to stop kids from drinking all together, but don’t want teens to be afraid to call for help when they need it. How do you prevent illegal drinking and encourage openness about it at the same time? Part of the program’s goal is the open those lines of discussion, to better establish expectations and consequences.

Unfortunately, the powerful program can only be performed in Piedmont once every four years, the minimum amount necessary to ensure that all students have a chance to experience it. According to Millennium principal Ting Hsu Engelman “It’s a tremendous amount of work, it’s a tremendous amount of resources.” Indeed, a grant is necessary for each school wishing to use the program.

Though the program seems well-designed, there is little evidence available to confirm its effectiveness. Let’s hope that the students at Piedmont and Millennium high schools took the message to heart.

Photo Credit: Kim Woods

View the original article here

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Virginia's new highly publicized ban on text messaging while driving is another perfect example of how lawmakers with no guts pass a law then pat themselves on the back for promoting safety.

If they truly wanted to make Virginia roads safer, they would ban cell phone use.

But they won't. They'll just continue to waste taxpayer money "debating" silly, unenforceable laws like this one.

Here's the rest of my rant on the Virginia Ban on Text Messaging.

Message:

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.

For security purposes, please enter the graphic text in the box below: [hit F5 if you can not read the text]

View the original article here

Posted on Friday, 21 October 2011

In the spring, one was given "Healthy Kids survey" Piedmont and Millennium high school students. Shockingly of self-reported students that 48% of Juniors had driven car, after she had drunk or was in a car from a friend, had been drinking.

Hoping to reverse the trends revealed in this survey, the California Highway patrol to schools travels as Piedmont provides powerful "every 15 minutes"-presentations. The presentations include a live staging of a fatal drunk driving crash, a memorial at the school the next day and a video presentation and discussion a few weeks later. According to the program Web site is the destination connection emotionally drunken driving with negative consequences go beyond "the intellectual statistics" which bombed for young people.

On 3 October this year police and fire departments responding real on the model crash one drunk teenage driver and his two passengers, and a different teenage driver, with a passenger. In the simulation, the drunk driver and one of his friends was unhurt, but the second passenger was killed when he flew through the windscreen. The other car's driver were seriously injured, but not survive.

The next day collected the whole school for a memorial service, the heavy on the eve of model demonstration home should go. The students were also informed that the drunk driver was sentenced to 26 years in prison.

In particular, the California Highway Patrol program is not all, and takes the opportunity, the teen drinking students and parents about the realities and driving habits speak to bring. Piedmont area a lively exchange, in which students parents was told that they feel she would call for trips home, if they believed, that they bring in trouble would not. Parents said they felt uneasy about the tolerance in their home or at any other time.

This reality puts parents in a difficult situation. They want children drinking everything to stop, but wants young people to fear, to summon help when they need it. How to prevent that illegal drinking and promote openness to, at the same time? Part of the program objective is the open those lines of discussion, expectations and follow better set.

Unfortunately the powerful program can run only in Piedmont every four years, the minimum required to ensure that all students have a chance to experience it. According to Millennium of main Ting Hsu Engelman, "it is an enormous amount of work, it is a huge resource." In fact, there is a scholarship for every school that want to use the program.

Although well, it seems there is little evidence available to verify their effectiveness. It is hoped that the message took high schools students in Piedmont and Millennium to the heart.

Photo credit: Kim Woods

View the original article here

Virginia published new high ban on text messaging while driving a is another example for passing as legislators with no courage a law then pat on the back of the safety.

If she seriously wanted to make Virginia roads safer, she would ban cell phone use.

But they are not. You will only continue to taxpayer money "discuss" stupid, unenforceable laws like this waste.

Here, the rest is my rant on the Virginia ban on text messaging.

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]

View the original article here

So, there was one were somewhat recent case in which a driver and his rear-ended after stopping for a flock of geese cross the road. It suffered some minor injuries and lawsuit in Fairfax General District Court. They lost, because the judge found that it was contributorily negligent in stop for the geese, were not to give the driver behind them proper warning, leading to the accident.

The plaintiff appealed that they were required by law, to stop for the geese, as it is illegal, "Cause the death of a migratory bird" as the geese were bernache Canada argue.

Now am I not, birds or other animals for that matter, but what, if the injuries were so minor not kill? What happens if the plaintiff due to an accident died? I certainly understand the spirit of the law that illegally, murder should it be animals but when driving a vehicle and choose your security and your life is if you select always your safety. Not to say that you can not try, they avoid or slow down, but slapped on your brakes, in this case it simply not in the value of it and it is on two counts. A that their injuries were minor. And two, were able to collect them, which ended, the only awards for their medical bills.

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]

View the original article here

The Supreme Court of Virginia recently a number of decisions and of two tort cases are reversed and cases released custody, after the trial judge the gun jumped on dismissal as a right.

In the first case a tenant responsible by was a landlord for his eye injury to forms after the landlord negligently repaired the property. The judge dismissed the case, because he, that felt their was no claim for negligence, as the eye injuries caused by the previous existence of mold and no failed repairs.

The second case involved a cyclist that turn from a vehicle left was taken on his way. The judge dismissed the case keeps the cyclists contributorily negligent was because he saw in his speedometer directly in front of the impact.

From the SCoVA: "You take the opportunity again [W] e litigation stress the principle of the tort that questions of negligence and immediate cause to determine usually questions of fact for the jury, shall instead of questions to the Court of Justice as a right."

One comment to "VA Supreme Court sends message trial judges on early release"

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]

View the original article here

Virginia's new high prohibition is published SMS while driving another perfect example for passing as legislators with no courage a law then pat themselves on the back of the safety.

If she really wanted to make Virginia roads safer, she would ban cell phone use.

But they are not. You will only continue to taxpayer money "discuss" stupid, unenforceable laws like this waste.

Here, the rest is my rant on the Virginia ban on text messaging.

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]

View the original article here

The National Safety Council released new traffic accident statistics, providing mixed signals. On the plus side the data shared indicates that decreased the number of car accident deaths in 2010. This reduction in fatality accident rates continue one trend of declining fatality number of accidents in the last four year period. There are also some discouraging signs in the Daten.Mehr than 34,700 people killed which represents a 3 percent decline of 2009 in 2010, deadly traffic accidents. While a consistent downward trend in the car deaths in the last four years it has accident, was slowing the degradation rates. The most disturbing characters is that the accident rate 2010 actually increased in the last quarter. This result is important questions about whether vehicles, drivers and roads have become safer, or there is simply less miles, is powered.

If someone you love has been involved in a fatal car accident, we understand the grief and pain you experience. Our experienced Georgia auto accident lawyers understand the legal issues, insurance complications and financial worry that accompany a serious car accident. We know that if you have to do with the loss of a loved one, these administrative matters are the last things on your mind. We help to deal with our customers by these questions, so that our customers can handle their grief and focus to help to recover their families from the trauma of the loss of a beloved. We work to get hard to the best possible result for our customers, and have since families help more than 27 years.

There were a great many advances in vehicle safety standards, the reduction in the motor vehicle fatality rates can explain. These improvements include:

Superior crash improved roof strength RatingsAnti lock BrakesAdditional air BagsElectronic stabilisation ControlCrash warning system backup camera systems

While improving vehicle safety features more stringent laws be car to curb dangerous driving practices with lower accident rates fatality to the credited. Many of the most dangerous driving practices become crimes or were associated with more severe penalties. Some legal measures that have helped may include falling accident rates:

Stricter drunk driving PenaltiesGraduated driver license programs for teen DriversProhibitions to talk on a cell phone during Driving zero tolerance laws in relation to alcohol for minors of DriversBans on texting during DrivingUse traffic to enforce cameras for red light violations

Despite these improvements in vehicle safety and security of traffic laws, some argue that the decline in the data flow rates fatality fool. The prices seem backed are, as that is, the fewer drivers are on the road the economy to a standstill, and be less total number of miles driven is. The increase in fatality number of accidents in the last quarter of 2010 as the economy improved supports for this theory. Those who believe that the reduction of road deaths are simply a product of the current recession show similar trends, the poor economic performance and reduced number of accidents in the past fatality.

Ultimately, all we can do is Georgia tries streets safer with continued innovations in vehicle safety, more stringent traffic safety laws and the personal responsibility for driving safe make. If you have been seriously injured or you have lost a lover in a serious car accident, automatically the experienced Atlanta car accident lawyers and Georgia accident committed lawyers Montlick and staff receive the best results for our customers. It is our goal, the best legal services within the framework of our ongoing commitment not only our as the top car accident lawyers in Atlanta and very Georgia.

Car accident lawyers are our experienced Atlanta Georgia for customers in all Georgia and in the Southeast, including but not limited to Albany, Athens, Atlanta, Augusta, Columbus, Gainesville, Macon, Marietta, Rome, Roswell, Savannah, Smyrna, Valdosta, helping Warner Robins and all the smaller towns and rural areas in the State. No matter where you are our lawyers are only a phone call away, and we come to you. Call the week us 24 hours a day/7 days for your free consultation at 1-800-LAW-NEED (1-800-529-6333). You can also visit us at www.montlick.com and use our free case evaluation form or 24-hour live online chat.

View the original article here

The Supreme Court of Virginia recently released a series of decisions and two tort cases that you, and vice versa jumped cases to trial judges the gun to discharge as a matter of law.

In the first case claimed a tenant a landlord for his eye injury by responsible was form and after the landlord negligently repaired the property. The judge dismissed the case, because he, that felt their was no claim for negligence as the eye injuries caused by the previous existence of mold and no failed repairs.

The second case involved a cyclist who turn from a vehicle left across his path was taken. The judge dismissed the case keeps the cyclists contributorily negligent was because he saw in his speedometer directly in front of the impact.

From the SCoVA: "[W] e which take opportunity to once again litigation stress the principle of the tort, that questions of negligence and immediate cause to determine, shall instead of questions to the Court as a matter of law usually questions of fact for the jury."

One comment to "VA Supreme Court sends message to trial judges on early release"

Message:

Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.

For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]

View the original article here

Can 911 emergency text, the messaging services to more danger and help car accidents on the road? (Photo by ABC News)

The FCC announced only Monday that texting services to the 911 emergency lineup are added. The Government agency texting services as part of their response in an emergency decided system because 70 percent of the 911 calls from mobile devices are derived. Now, people with a view to a relay emergency help to dispatchers with text services, according to ABC News. But how will the texting mix 911 with texting and driving laws in California?

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski committed, to modernise FCC protocol called it the next-generation 911 service. "911 is an indispensable tool-saving lives," said Genachowski. "But 911 system now supports the communication tools of tomorrow." "Can you even if the institution of choice for most mobile phones are 911 caller and we now use our phones to text, in the first place, text 911."

The professionals of the next generation 911 service allows individuals to communicate with emergency services in situations where they cannot speak. This is case of an emergency car accident be useful, if a person with some sort of technical difficulties facing: no signal, low battery, or bad service.

A see con to emergency services texting is however that can, impose possible distraction, which already take it to the, in particular, if they are in a dangerous situation. Distracted driving laws in California including cell phone use and text-messaging were strict, and for good reason.

According to the national highway traffic safety increases choose administration a mobile phone the risk of a car accident or car accident close to 2.8 times. And text-messaging the risk of a car accident or in the vicinity of car accident a staggering increased 23.2 times as compared to the car accident statistics with drivers not distracted.

TEXTING while driving has the potential, create a crash epidemic if texting continues to grow in popularity. If, in connection with a real emergency texting 911 must not affect the maintenance of security on the road?

The jury is out: should modernize the FCC 911 calls with text services, or this represents a further threat to cause accidents on the road?

Have if you were injured in a car accident from suspected text messages or mobile use, refer to our San Diego auto accident attorneys today at 1-800-655-6585 for a free evaluation of your case.

View the original article here