Governor HaslamTells Brain Injured Tennesseans Their Injuries are not Catastrophic and Tells Tennessee Voters They are Stupid and Must be Controlled from Nashville
AppId is over the quota
Home > Legal Issues > Governor HaslamTells Brain Injured Tennesseans Their Injuries are not Catastrophic and Tells Tennessee Voters They are Stupid and Must be Controlled from NashvillePosted on June 19, 2011 by Morgan Adams
Governor Haslam has signed a law that states that non-economic damages should be capped in injury (tort) cases In Tennessee at $750,000 in most cases. Now in Tennessee juries are trusted to sentence a man to death, but apparently they are not trusted by the Governor to determine the proper amount of compensation for victims of someone else's wrongdoing in an injury case. There is not even a "three strikes and you're out" rule for really bad people and corporations that are repeat offenders!
Whether you agree or disagree with jury limits doesn't really matter, as the Tennessee Legislature and Governor Haslam can pass whatever legislation they want, and apparently they wanted to limit the amount of non-economic damages that can be received from someone injured by a wrongdoer. The new law is flawed in several aspects in my opinion.
First there is the hypocrisy in allowing "unlimited" damages against those that commit intentional acts. That sounds great but the Governor and legislators know that NO INSURANCE POLICY IN TENNESSEE WILL PAY FOR AN INTENTIONAL ACT. It is EXCLUDED from the policy. Thus an an injured victim will likely get less money, not more, if you prove the defendant acted intentionally. It sounds good on a stump speech, but in reality this section of the law gives nothing and takes away everything form the injured. The Governor could have easily required insurance companies to cover these acts, but chose not to do so.
The second level of the legislature's and Governor's hypocrisy is that juror's WONT BE TOLD that there are limits in place. They believe that they helped someone, when in reality the government took it away and made them sweat out determining the amount of non-economic damages above $750,000 in the jury room for NO PURPOSE.
The final part of this tragedy is that the Governor will allow some catastrophically injured Tennesseans to receive more than others. There is a special category for "catastrophic loss," which would raise the cap for non-economic damages in cases involving serious spinal cord injuries, severe burns, some severe multiple amputations, or the death of a parent of minor children. Now this new law excludes parents of adult special needs children, children taking care of the elderly (don't worry, they can go to a state run nursing home), victims with brain injuries, twenty year olds who have to wear diapers, or a bag, to catch excrement and waste fluids, chronic pain, etc...
Shouldn't we let a jury, on a case by case basis, decide if these cases are catastrophic after hearing the all facts? Shouldn't we let a jury decide that if you kill enough Tennesseans, you are going to get put out of business? Do parents taking care of special needs adult children, really deserve less than parents taking care of minor children? The Governor and legislature chose to take away these choices from the jury. Some Tennesseans are now more different than others and none of us are as special as corporations.
Many of my clients are brain injured, and catastrophically so, even if they are able to walk and talk. Their lives, as they knew them prior to the wreck, are over. In many case their personalities have changed. They died, but their life goes on. I find it arbitrary, and frankly an abuse of power, that the Governor has decided who can be catastrophically injured in advance of knowing all the facts. That Nashville knows better than a jury of 12 Tennesseans. I guess I trust the people of Tennessee more than those in office now. Voter's of Tennessee, your governor and your legislature just called you too stupid to do what is right in a jury box. (they also called the Judge, lawyers in the case, the Courts of Appeal and the Tennessee Supreme Court too stupid to get it as well, but hey, they were on a roll.) Voters you need to remember this come November.
Kid Gets Drunk, Gets Hurt, Then Sues--Another Stupid Lawsuit
AppId is over the quota
Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.
I'm tired of stupid class actions
This class action lawsuit had nothing to do with product safety. Neither my family nor I were our lawn mower in danger because of the. This ridiculous complaint was about "claims that the defendants misrepresented and the performance of their lawn mower and lawn mower engines set too high." Although the defendants deny these allegations, she agreed to rules.
Class-action lawsuit in this case, the lawyers want to collect more than $14 million in fees.
Here the problem is that I have with this type of class action lawsuits - I never knew I was damaged by my lawn mower and I bet hundreds of thousands of consumers that these products from January 1994 until April 12, 2010 bought never knew she damaged were either. It has gone crazy an excellent example of complaints. Cases such as this jam of the judicial system and prevent that the timely resolution of legitimate claims.
Stupid, class-action lawsuits are an abomination of the tort system. Claims should be made unlawful acts only by persons who have actually suffered damage and not part of an unknown class of persons who were not harmed, not even thought that they were damaged and not go and hire a lawyer to file a complaint.
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
Taco Bell claim deleted (we told you it was a stupid lawsuit)
I was right. Deleted the stupid lawsuit, which was million cost to the company.
Taco Bell can go to get another round of the public of this.
One comment to "Taco Bell lawsuit dropped (we told you it was a stupid action)"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
Off for security reasons, enter the image text in the box below: [press F5 when you can't read the text]
Governor HaslamTells brain injured people their injuries Tennessee not fateful and told voters they are stupid are and must be controlled from Nashville
Governor Haslam has signed a law that says that non-economic damages in injury (tort) in Tennessee at $750,000 in most cases should be limited. Now in Tennessee, juries are trusted so that you have a to condemn a man to death, but apparently they are not trusted by the Governor, other misconduct in the case of a breach to determine, the right amount of compensation for victims of someone. There is not even a "three strikes and you are out" rule for really bad people and companies, are the repeat offenders!
Whether you agree or disagree with jury borders doesn't really matter, such as the Tennessee legislature and Governor Haslam which legislation passed they want, and they can non-economic damages that injured can be received by someone from a wrongdoer apparently wanted the limit. The new law is flawed in some respects my opinion.
There is first the hypocrisy in so that the intentional acts to "unlimited" damages against those. The Governor and legislature sounds great, but, that number will pay insurance policy IN TENNESSEE for an intentional act. It is excluded from the directive. So a an injured victims probably receive less money no longer, if you prove the defendant willfully traded. It sounds good on a speech stump, but in reality in this section of the law, nothing is, and everything takes form the injured. The Governor could have easily need to cover these acts of insurance companies, but decided not to do.
The second level of the legislature and the Governor is hypocrisy, juror wont be said that there are limits. They believe that they helped someone, when in reality the Government took it on and they sweat made non-economic damages of 750,000 in the jury room of determining the amount no. purposes.
The last part of this tragedy is that the Governor more than others receive allows some catastrophically injured people. There is a special category for "catastrophic loss", which some serious cross-cutting problems, severe burns, the CAP for non-economic damages in cases where serious multiple amputations or the death of a parent of minor children would increase. Now, this new law includes the parents of adult special needs children, children takes care of older people (don't worry, they can go, perform a state nursing home), victims, chronic pain, etc. Hirnverletzte, twenty-year-old, the diapers or a bag to catch, faeces and waste wear...
Let should not we decide a jury, on a case by case basis, whether these cases are disastrous after hearing all the facts? Let should not we choose a jury, that when you kill enough people, you are out to get out of business? Parents have under the supervision of disabled adult children, really earn less than parents take care of minors? The Governor and the legislature chose to take these decisions of the jury. Some people are now more than any other different and company are none of us something special.
Many of my clients are injured, brain and disastrously so, even if they are able to walk and talk. Their lives, they are as in they knew to the wreck, over. In many cases, their personalities have changed. She died, but their life goes on. I think it is arbitrary, and honest said an abuse of power that the Governor has decided, in the run-up to know all the facts can be catastrophically injured. The Nashville knows better than a jury of 12 further. I guess I more than that in the hope the people of Tennessee now. Voter's Tennessee, just referred you to do your Governor and your legislature, what correctly in a jury box is stupid. (it is also as judges, lawyers in the case of the courts of appeal and the Tennessee Supreme Court too stupid, get it also, but hey, they have been on a roll.) Voters, they must come November.
I'm tired of stupid class-action suits
This class action lawsuit had nothing to do with the product safety. Neither my family nor I have been in danger because our lawn mower. This ridiculous complaint was about the "claims that it misinterpreted the defendant and she exaggerated performance of lawn mowers and lawn mower of engines." Although the defendants deny these allegations, she agreed to rules.
In this case want the lawyers collect particularly class-action lawsuit over $14 million in fees.
Here is the problem I have with this type of class action lawsuits - I never knew I was damaged by my lawn mower and I bet the hundreds of thousands of consumers that these products from January 1994 until April 12, 2010 bought never knew she damaged were either. It has gone crazy an excellent example of complaints. Cases such as this jam of the judicial system and to prevent that the timely resolution of legitimate claims.
Stupid, class-action suits are an abomination of the tort system. Tort claims should only be made by people who have actually suffered damage and not part of a unknown class of persons who were not harmed, not even thought that they were damaged and not go and hire a lawyer to file a complaint.
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]
Taco Bell claim deleted (we told you it was a stupid action)
I was right. Deleted the stupid lawsuit, which was million cost to the company.
Taco Bell can go to get another round of the public of this.
One comment to "Taco Bell lawsuit 0xb5a (we told you it was a stupid action)"
Message:
Notify me of follow up comments via e-Mail.
For security purposes, you give the graphic text in the box below: [press F5 if you can't read the text]
